Export limit exceeded: 369409 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (8373 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-8505 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 has a vulnerability in Langflow's webhook authentication logic allows unauthenticated users to trigger the execution of any flow. The system incorrectly bypasses API key validation when the WEBHOOK_AUTH_ENABLE configuration is set to False (which is the default setting). This allows a remote attacker who knows a flow's UUID to execute it as if they were the owner, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE). | ||||
| CVE-2026-7755 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-22 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow remote code execution due to incomplete validation enforcement on MCP server configuration files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13448 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-22 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Lanflow OSS contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the public flow build endpoint ( /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow ). The vulnerability stems from an incomplete denylist in the validate_public_flow_no_code_execution() function that fails to block several code-execution agent components including OpenDsStarAgent, CodeActAgentSmolagents, and CSVAgent. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7754 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-21 | 7.7 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow 1.9.0 could allow server-side request forgery (SSRF) due to insecure default configuration and incomplete enforcement of the SSRF protection mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13473 | 1 Ibm | 1 Storage Protect Client | 2026-07-21 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Storage Protect Client 8.1.0.0 through 8.1.27.0, 8.1.27.1, and 8.2.0.0 through 8.2.1.0 IBM Storage Protect is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A remote attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system or cause the server to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15322 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Ai Hub | 2026-07-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the exposure of session tokens in URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7771 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2026-07-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.4 is vulnerable to a trap when compiling a specially crafted statements containing subqueries could lead to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8635 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-21 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to superuser by directly manipulating the database, execute arbitrary system commands, and achieve full system compromise with Langflow service permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9171 | 1 Ibm | 1 Powervm Novalink | 2026-07-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM PowerVM Novalink are vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by sending a specially-crafted request. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the server to consume memory resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9135 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-20 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code execution on the backend despite custom component restrictions. The vulnerability can be escalated through cross-tenant flow manipulation via the agentic MCP update_flow_component_field tool, which accepts attacker-controlled user_id parameters, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into victim users' flows. When combined with publicly accessible flows and specific misconfigurations (AUTO_LOGIN=true, NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true), the attack can be conducted with reduced authentication requirements. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8861 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-07-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8056 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-20 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to override component parameters at runtime via the API. A critical security flaw exists in the parameter filtering mechanism within the `apply_tweaks()` function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4938 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-07-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an attacker with read-only privileges to make unauthorized modifications and deployments outside of their assigned permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13445 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-20 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an authenticated attacker to exploit the SaveToFile component to read and modify another user's uploaded files by specifying absolute paths pointing to victim storage locations. In append mode, the attacker's workflow reads victim file contents, appends attacker-controlled data, and uploads a copy containing victim data to the attacker's namespace (confidentiality breach). In overwrite mode, the attacker can replace victim file contents with arbitrary data (integrity breach). This breaks the storage ownership boundary between users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14501 | 1 Ibm | 2 Agentics, Db2 Genius Hub | 2026-07-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2 and IBM Agentics 1.0 could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code or obtain sensitive information due to the use of dangerous functions without sufficient restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14979 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Lifecycle Management | 2026-07-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management 7.0.3 ( Interim Fix 001 through ) Interim Fix 021, 7.1.0 ( Interim Fix 001 through ) Interim Fix 009, and 7.2.0 and 7.2.0 Interim Fix 001 DOORS could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper handling of XML entity expansion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15091 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Ai Hub | 2026-07-20 | 9.3 Critical |
| IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary scripts due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8476 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-20 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the disk-based caching mechanism. The AsyncDiskCache class uses Python's unsafe pickle.loads() function to deserialize cached objects from disk without validation, integrity verification, or authentication, enabling arbitrary code execution when malicious pickle payloads are processed. Attackers who can influence cached data through file system access, malicious workflow inputs, custom components, or API manipulation can achieve complete system compromise with the privileges of the Langflow server process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4942 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-07-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to send a specifically crafted message and downgrade the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to a version disabled in the server configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15069 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Ai Hub | 2026-07-20 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary script code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||