| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| xszyou Fay 4.3.1 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in its MCP STDIO server management and command execution handling. A remote attacker can access the publicly exposed MCP management interface and configure an MCP STDIO server with attacker-controlled commands and parameters, resulting in execution of arbitrary commands on the server. Successful exploitation allows arbitrary command execution within the context of the Fay service. |
| Permissive Cross-domain Security Policy with Untrusted Domains in ASUS GameSDK allows a remote user to obtain a local user’s NTLM hash by convincing the user to visit a crafted web page that sends a request containing a UNC path to the application’s local service endpoint. This can result in information disclosure or data tampering, may cause GameSDK to become unavailable, and may also enable access to the victim’s information on other services.
Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS GameSDK ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information. |
| An issue in Generic OEM UZ801_v2.1 4G LTE Router V3.4.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the sbin/adbd component |
| Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a simple template language. In versions prior to 2.4.3, banks parses Tool JSON objects from the rendered body of {% completion %} blocks and later resolves their import_path field through importlib.import_module(...) + getattr(...) to obtain the callable that handles a tool call. There is no allowlist or sanitization on import_path, so any importable Python attribute (e.g. os.system, subprocess.getoutput) can be selected. When the LLM emits a tool_calls entry whose function.name matches the attacker-supplied tool name, the resolved callable is invoked with kwargs decoded from tool_call.function.arguments, yielding arbitrary code execution in the banks-hosting process. This is distinct from GHSA-gphh-9q3h-jgpp / CVE-2026-44209. That advisory was fixed in 2.4.2 by switching src/banks/env.py from Environment to SandboxedEnvironment. The fix does not touch src/banks/extensions/completion.py, and the unsafe import + getattr chain still executes on 2.4.2. The malicious Tool JSON is plain text in the rendered template body — it requires no Jinja attribute access, so the sandbox is irrelevant. This issue has been fixed in version 2.4.3. |
| Inappropriate implementation in AdFilter in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to inject scripts or HTML into a privileged page via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| The ElementsKit Elementor Addons WordPress plugin before 3.10.01 does not prevent a custom-widget definition saved by a user with administrative capabilities from being written verbatim into a generated PHP file that the ElementsKit Elementor Addons WordPress plugin before 3.10.01 subsequently executes, allowing arbitrary PHP code to run on the server; on a multisite network this lets a non-super subsite Administrator, who is otherwise denied code/file editing, reach host-level code execution beyond the privileges the network grants them. |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to bypass same origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| An issue in Generic OEM UZ801_v2.1 4G LTE Router V3.4.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the /ajax web management API endpoint in MifiService.apk |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in the PythonREPL sandbox implementation. |
| Inappropriate implementation in Scheduling in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| Prompty is a markdown file format (.prompty) for LLM prompts. From 2.0.0-alpha.1 until 2.0.0-beta.3, the @prompty/core TypeScript loader in runtime/typescript/packages/core/src/core/loader.ts used gray-matter without overriding executable js and javascript frontmatter engines, allowing an attacker-controlled .prompty file with ---js frontmatter to execute arbitrary JavaScript during prompt loading. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.0-beta.3. |
| An issue in SJCAM AllWinner Tech products SJ4000-Air V1.4C and before and Whitelabel based v.1.4C and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted FEX file |
| Improper control of code generation in Amazon @aws-amplify/codegen-ui-react before 2.20.6 might allow a remote authenticated user to execute arbitrary code in end-user browsers, developer machines, CI/CD environments, and server-side rendering contexts via crafted Studio component or theme schema values due to insufficient coverage and effectiveness of the input validation introduced for CVE-2025-4318.
To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 2.20.6 |
| Inappropriate implementation in Enterprise in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| The Remote API WordPress plugin through 0.2 does not authenticate a request before deserializing user-supplied input, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary PHP objects, which can lead to remote code execution when a suitable gadget chain is present through another installed Remote API WordPress plugin through 0.2. |
| Inappropriate implementation in SurfaceCapture in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
