| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Denial of service in Oracle TNSLSNR SQL*Net Listener via a malformed string to the listener port, aka NERP. |
| Multiple buffer overflows in the XML Database (XDB) functionality for Oracle 9i Database Release 2 allow local users to cause a denial of service or hijack user sessions. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in HTTP Server in Oracle Database Server 8i up to 10.1.0.4.2 and Application Server 1.0.2.2 up to 10.1.2.0 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) DB30 and AS03 or (2) DB31 and AS05. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database Server 8i up to 10.1.0.4.2 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) DB09 in Export, (2) DB11 in Materialized Views, and (3) DB16 in Security Service. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.7, 10.1.0.5, and other versions have unknown impact and attack vectors in the (1) Advanced Replication component, as identified by Vuln# DB01, and (2) Oracle Spatial component, as identified by Vuln# DB10. NOTE: details are unavailable from Oracle, but as of 20060421, they have not publicly disputed a claim by a reliable independent researcher that states that DB01 is an unknown issue in the DBMS_REPUTIL package, and DB10 is SQL injection in the INSERT_CATALOG, UPDATE_CATALOG, and DELETE_CATALOG functions of the SDO_CATALOG package. |
| Multiple buffer overflows in Oracle 9i Database release 2, Release 1, 8i, 8.1.7, and 8.0.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long conversion string argument to the TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ function, (2) a long time zone argument to the TZ_OFFSET function, or (3) a long DIRECTORY parameter to the BFILENAME function. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 10.1.0.4.2, Application Server 10.1.2.0.2, and Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i) has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DBC02 in the Reorganize Objects & Convert Tablespace component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 9.2.0.7, Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.1, Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i), and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# WF01 in the Oracle Workflow Cartridge component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5, Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, and Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i) has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DBC01 in the Protocol Support component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Intelligent Agent in Oracle Database Server 9i up to 9.0.1.5 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# DB14. |
| Oracle Database 8i, 9i, and 10g allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL statements in the context of the SYS user and bypass audit logging, including statements to create new privileged database accounts, via a modified AUTH_ALTER_SESSION attribute in the authentication phase of the Transparent Network Substrate (TNS) protocol. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that this issue has been addressed by Oracle. It is possible that this is the same issue as Oracle Vuln# DB18 from the January 2006 CPU, in which case this would be subsumed by CVE-2006-0265. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Oracle 9i and 10g allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long token in the text of a wrapped procedure. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Upgrade & Downgrade component of Oracle Database server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.4 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB28. NOTE: details are unavailable from Oracle, but they have not publicly disputed a claim by a reliable independent researcher that states that the problem is SQL injection in the DBMS_REGISTRY package in certain parameters to the (1) IS_COMPONENT, (2) GET_COMP_OPTION, (3) DISABLE_DDL_TRIGGERS, (4) SCRIPT_EXISTS, (5) COMP_PATH, (6) GATHER_STATS, (7) NOTHING_SCRIPT, and (8) VALIDATE_COMPONENTS functions. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Database Scheduler in Oracle Database Server 10g up to 10.1.0.3 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# DB08. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the Oracle Text component of Oracle Database 10g, and possibly earlier versions, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unknown vectors. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that this issue has been addressed by Oracle. It is possible that this is the same issue as Oracle Vuln# DB15 from the January 2006 CPU, in which case this would be subsumed by CVE-2006-0260. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Single Sign-On in Oracle Database Server 10g up to 10.1.0.4.2 and Application Server 9.0.2.3 up to 9.0.4.2 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# DB33 and AS08. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database Server 10g up to 10.1.0.4.2 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) DB02, (2) DB03, and (3) DB05 in Change Data Capture; (4) DB07 in Data Pump Export; and (5) DB18, (6) DB19, (7) DB20, (8) DB21, (9) DB22, (10) DB23, (11) DB24, and (12) DB25 in the Spatial component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Thesaurus Management System component in Oracle E-Business Suite and OPA 4.5.2 Applications has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Vuln# OPA01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the PL/SQL component in Oracle Database Server 9i up to 10.1.0.4 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# DB01. |
| Oracle Database Server 10g Release 2 allows local users to execute arbitrary SQL queries via the GET_DOMAIN_INDEX_METADATA function in the DBMS_EXPORT_EXTENSION package. NOTE: this issue was originally linked to DB05 (CVE-2006-1870), but a reliable third party has claimed that it is not the same issue. Based on details of the problem, the primary issue appears to be insecure privileges that facilitate the introduction of SQL in a way that is not related to special characters, so this is not "SQL injection" per se. |
