| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in JobSearch <= 3.2.7 versions. |
| Backpropagate is a Python library for fine-tuning large language models on a single GPU. In versions 1.1.0 and 1.1.1, the optional Reflex web UI exposes a training control plane without authentication: dataset upload, model load, training start/stop, multi-run orchestration, GGUF export, and HuggingFace Hub push. The CLI accepts two operator-facing flags intended as security controls: --auth user:pass — documented as "require HTTP Basic authentication on every request to the UI." and--share — documented as "expose the UI on a public address; requires --auth." When --auth user:pass is passed, the CLI prints Auth: enabled (user: <username>) to confirm to the operator that authentication is active, then exports BACKPROPAGATE_UI_AUTH=user:pass to the subprocess that launches the Reflex backend. The Reflex backend (backpropagate/ui_app/**) never reads BACKPROPAGATE_UI_AUTH. No authentication middleware is registered. No request-level guard runs. No WebSocket upgrade guard runs. Any client that reaches the bound port — local or remote, depending on whether --share is used — has full UI access. An inline comment at backpropagate/cli.py:1217-1218 in the v1.1.0 source documents the gap: "For Phase 1 the variable is exported but Reflex doesn't read it yet." This comment was internal-facing; the user-facing documentation (README, CHANGELOG, SHIP_GATE) advertised the contract as enforced. An attacker who reaches the bound port can read uploaded datasets, trigger arbitrary training runs against any local base models as well as read their paths, trigger HuggingFace Hub pushes and cause disk-fill DoS. This issue has been fixed in version 1.2.0. If developers cannot immediately upgrade to 1.2.0 run backprop ui with no flags so it binds to localhost, use SSH port-forwarding (ssh -L 7860:localhost:7860 <training-host>) instead of --share for remote access, and audit any host previously launched with --share, re-issuing any HF tokens used during those sessions. |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Yoast BV Yoast SEO Premium allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.
This issue affects Yoast SEO Premium: from n/a through 26.6. |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in WordPress Dating Theme <= 11.2.0 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in User Registration Stripe <= 1.3.14 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in WooCommerce Anti-Fraud <= 7.2.6 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in User Registration Stripe <= 1.3.12 versions. |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Jegstudio Startupzy startupzy allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.
This issue affects Startupzy: from n/a through 1.1.1. |
| : Missing Authorization vulnerability in Inisev Social Media & Share Icons allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.
This issue affects Social Media & Share Icons: from n/a through 2.8.6. |
| Quanos SCHEMA ST4 on-premises contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Client Update Service. The update service runs as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM and exposes a .NET Remoting interface over a named pipe without sufficient access controls or authorization. A local authenticated low-privileged user can connect to the interface and invoke privileged update methods such as Update(). This allows arbitrary file write and delete operations with SYSTEM privileges and can be used to achieve local privilege escalation. |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in ali2woo AliNext allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.
This issue affects AliNext: from n/a through 3.3.5. |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Rara Themes Metro Magazine allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.
This issue affects Metro Magazine: from n/a through 1.3.7. |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in EMV JobBank allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.
This issue affects JobBank: from n/a through 1.2.3. |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Nexi Payments Nexi XPay allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.
This issue affects Nexi XPay: from n/a through 8.3.1. |
| The Event Koi Lite – Events Calendar, Event Management, RSVP, and Tickets plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.13.1 via the get_events. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including virtual meeting URLs, physical location data, latitude/longitude coordinates, Google Maps links, and RSVP configuration belonging to draft, pending, and private events that are otherwise inaccessible via public URLs. |
| An authenticated authorization bypass vulnerability exists in MCP Toolbox for Databases due to missing scope enforcement across older protocol handlers.
While the 2025-11-25 protocol version handler correctly enforces per-tool restrictions defined by scopesRequired, older supported protocol versions (2025-06-18, 2025-03-26, and 2024-11-05) omit this check. An authenticated client with low-privilege tokens (e.g., read) can bypass the intended per-tool scope restrictions and execute high-privilege tools (e.g., admin) simply by specifying an older protocol version in the MCP-Protocol-Version header, or by omitting the header entirely (which causes the server to default to the vulnerable 2024-11-05 handler). |
| The WP MAPS PRO WordPress plugin before 6.1.1 registers an unauthenticated AJAX action which, given a valid nonce that is publicly emitted on any frontend page enqueuing its map script, unconditionally creates an administrator account and returns a magic-login URL granting interactive admin access. |
| In Contacts Provider, there is a possible way to access an incoming call's phone number and associated metadata due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In Package Manager, there is a possible device lock controller bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In Telecomm, there is a possible way to initiate an unauthorized phone call due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
