Search Results (334 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2019-5436 8 Debian, F5, Fedoraproject and 5 more 15 Debian Linux, Traffix Signaling Delivery Controller, Fedora and 12 more 2026-04-15 7.8 High
A heap buffer overflow in the TFTP receiving code allows for DoS or arbitrary code execution in libcurl versions 7.19.4 through 7.64.1.
CVE-2018-16842 4 Canonical, Debian, Haxx and 1 more 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Curl and 3 more 2026-04-15 N/A
Curl versions 7.14.1 through 7.61.1 are vulnerable to a heap-based buffer over-read in the tool_msgs.c:voutf() function that may result in information exposure and denial of service.
CVE-2018-14618 4 Canonical, Debian, Haxx and 1 more 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Libcurl and 3 more 2026-04-15 N/A
curl before version 7.61.1 is vulnerable to a buffer overrun in the NTLM authentication code. The internal function Curl_ntlm_core_mk_nt_hash multiplies the length of the password by two (SUM) to figure out how large temporary storage area to allocate from the heap. The length value is then subsequently used to iterate over the password and generate output into the allocated storage buffer. On systems with a 32 bit size_t, the math to calculate SUM triggers an integer overflow when the password length exceeds 2GB (2^31 bytes). This integer overflow usually causes a very small buffer to actually get allocated instead of the intended very huge one, making the use of that buffer end up in a heap buffer overflow. (This bug is almost identical to CVE-2017-8816.)
CVE-2025-49520 1 Redhat 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside 2026-04-15 8.8 High
A flaw was found in Ansible Automation Platform’s EDA component where user-supplied Git URLs are passed unsanitized to the git ls-remote command. This vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to inject arguments and execute arbitrary commands on the EDA worker. In Kubernetes/OpenShift environments, this can lead to service account token theft and cluster access.
CVE-2024-8775 1 Redhat 7 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 4 more 2026-04-15 5.5 Medium
A flaw was found in Ansible, where sensitive information stored in Ansible Vault files can be exposed in plaintext during the execution of a playbook. This occurs when using tasks such as include_vars to load vaulted variables without setting the no_log: true parameter, resulting in sensitive data being printed in the playbook output or logs. This can lead to the unintentional disclosure of secrets like passwords or API keys, compromising security and potentially allowing unauthorized access or actions.
CVE-2025-49521 1 Redhat 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside 2026-04-15 8.8 High
A flaw was found in the EDA component of the Ansible Automation Platform, where user-supplied Git branch or refspec values are evaluated as Jinja2 templates. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to inject expressions that execute commands or access sensitive files on the EDA worker. In OpenShift, it can lead to service account token theft.
CVE-2025-2877 1 Redhat 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
A flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform's Event-Driven Ansible. In configurations where verbosity is set to "debug", inventory passwords are exposed in plain text when starting a rulebook activation. This issue exists for any "debug" action in a rulebook and also affects Event Streams.
CVE-2024-5569 1 Redhat 5 Ansible Automation Platform, Openshift Ironic, Openstack and 2 more 2026-04-15 6.2 Medium
A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the jaraco/zipp library, affecting all versions prior to 3.19.1. The vulnerability is triggered when processing a specially crafted zip file that leads to an infinite loop. This issue also impacts the zipfile module of CPython, as features from the third-party zipp library are later merged into CPython, and the affected code is identical in both projects. The infinite loop can be initiated through the use of functions affecting the `Path` module in both zipp and zipfile, such as `joinpath`, the overloaded division operator, and `iterdir`. Although the infinite loop is not resource exhaustive, it prevents the application from responding. The vulnerability was addressed in version 3.19.1 of jaraco/zipp.
CVE-2024-24783 1 Redhat 23 Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage and 20 more 2026-04-15 5.9 Medium
Verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate with an unknown public key algorithm will cause Certificate.Verify to panic. This affects all crypto/tls clients, and servers that set Config.ClientAuth to VerifyClientCertIfGiven or RequireAndVerifyClientCert. The default behavior is for TLS servers to not verify client certificates.
CVE-2024-6840 1 Redhat 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside 2026-04-15 6.6 Medium
An improper authorization flaw exists in the Ansible Automation Controller. This flaw allows an attacker using the k8S API server to send an HTTP request with a service account token mounted via `automountServiceAccountToken: true`, resulting in privilege escalation to a service account.
CVE-2025-14025 1 Redhat 1 Ansible Automation Platform 2026-04-15 8.5 High
A flaw was found in Ansible Automation Platform (AAP). Read-only scoped OAuth2 API Tokens in AAP, are enforced at the Gateway level for Gateway-specific operations. However, this vulnerability allows read-only tokens to perform write operations on backend services (e.g., Controller, Hub, EDA). If this flaw were exploited, an attacker‘s capabilities would only be limited by role based access controls (RBAC).
CVE-2024-1657 1 Redhat 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside 2026-04-15 8.1 High
A flaw was found in the ansible automation platform. An insecure WebSocket connection was being used in installation from the Ansible rulebook EDA server. An attacker that has access to any machine in the CIDR block could download all rulebook data from the WebSocket, resulting in loss of confidentiality and integrity of the system.
CVE-2023-45288 3 Go Standard Library, Golang, Redhat 33 Net\/http, Http2, Acm and 30 more 2026-04-15 7.5 High
An attacker may cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data by sending an excessive number of CONTINUATION frames. Maintaining HPACK state requires parsing and processing all HEADERS and CONTINUATION frames on a connection. When a request's headers exceed MaxHeaderBytes, no memory is allocated to store the excess headers, but they are still parsed. This permits an attacker to cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data, all associated with a request which is going to be rejected. These headers can include Huffman-encoded data which is significantly more expensive for the receiver to decode than for an attacker to send. The fix sets a limit on the amount of excess header frames we will process before closing a connection.
CVE-2025-10894 1 Redhat 4 Acm, Ansible Automation Platform, Multicluster Globalhub and 1 more 2026-04-15 9.6 Critical
Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.
CVE-2024-21520 2 Django-rest-framework, Redhat 2 Django Rest Framework, Ansible Automation Platform 2026-04-15 6.1 Medium
Versions of the package djangorestframework before 3.15.2 are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the break_long_headers template filter due to improper input sanitization before splitting and joining with <br> tags.
CVE-2025-7738 1 Redhat 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer 2026-04-15 4.4 Medium
A flaw was found in Ansible Automation Platform (AAP) where the Gateway API returns the client secret for certain GitHub Enterprise authenticators in clear text. This vulnerability affects administrators or auditors accessing authenticator configurations. While access is limited to privileged users, the clear text exposure of sensitive credentials increases the risk of accidental leaks or misuse.
CVE-2024-11483 1 Redhat 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside 2026-04-15 5 Medium
A vulnerability was found in the Ansible Automation Platform (AAP). This flaw allows attackers to escalate privileges by improperly leveraging read-scoped OAuth2 tokens to gain write access. This issue affects API endpoints that rely on ansible_base.oauth2_provider for OAuth2 authentication. While the impact is limited to actions within the user’s assigned permissions, it undermines scoped access controls, potentially allowing unintended modifications in the application and consuming services.
CVE-2024-4340 1 Redhat 5 Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack, Rhui and 2 more 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Passing a heavily nested list to sqlparse.parse() leads to a Denial of Service due to RecursionError.
CVE-2024-35195 2 Redhat, Request Project 10 Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 7 more 2026-04-15 5.6 Medium
Requests is a HTTP library. Prior to 2.32.0, when making requests through a Requests `Session`, if the first request is made with `verify=False` to disable cert verification, all subsequent requests to the same host will continue to ignore cert verification regardless of changes to the value of `verify`. This behavior will continue for the lifecycle of the connection in the connection pool. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.32.0.
CVE-2023-45290 1 Redhat 20 Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage and 17 more 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
When parsing a multipart form (either explicitly with Request.ParseMultipartForm or implicitly with Request.FormValue, Request.PostFormValue, or Request.FormFile), limits on the total size of the parsed form were not applied to the memory consumed while reading a single form line. This permits a maliciously crafted input containing very long lines to cause allocation of arbitrarily large amounts of memory, potentially leading to memory exhaustion. With fix, the ParseMultipartForm function now correctly limits the maximum size of form lines.