Export limit exceeded: 346191 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9944 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-24708 | 1 W3speedster | 1 W3speedster | 2025-05-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in W3speedster W3SPEEDSTER.This issue affects W3SPEEDSTER: from n/a through 7.19. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20281 | 1 Cisco | 4 Nexus Dashboard, Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller, Nexus Dashboard Insights and 1 more | 2025-05-07 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Nexus Dashboard and Cisco Nexus Dashboard hosted services could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. If the affected user has administrative privileges, these actions could include modifying the system configuration and creating new privileged accounts. Note: There are internal security mechanisms in place that limit the scope of this exploit, reducing the Security Impact Rating of this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25600 | 2 Fedoraproject, Weplugins | 2 Fedora, Wp Maps | 2025-05-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting Delete Marker Category, Delete Map, and Copy Map functions in WP Google Map plugin (versions <= 4.2.3). | ||||
| CVE-2023-28172 | 1 Weplugins | 1 Wp Maps | 2025-05-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in flippercode WordPress Plugin for Google Maps – WP MAPS (formerly WP Google Map Plugin) plugin <= 4.4.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2015-9308 | 1 Weplugins | 1 Wp Maps | 2025-05-07 | 8.8 High |
| The wp-google-map-plugin plugin before 2.3.10 for WordPress has CSRF in the add/edit map feature. | ||||
| CVE-2015-9307 | 1 Weplugins | 1 Wp Maps | 2025-05-07 | 8.8 High |
| The wp-google-map-plugin plugin before 2.3.10 for WordPress has CSRF in the add/edit location feature. | ||||
| CVE-2015-9309 | 1 Weplugins | 1 Wp Maps | 2025-05-07 | 8.8 High |
| The wp-google-map-plugin plugin before 2.3.10 for WordPress has CSRF in the add/edit category feature. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6499 | 1 Calenfretts | 1 Lastunes | 2025-05-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| The lasTunes WordPress plugin through 3.6.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2022-3419 | 1 Addify | 1 Automatic User Roles Switcher | 2025-05-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Automatic User Roles Switcher WordPress plugin before 1.1.2 does not have authorisation and proper CSRF checks, allowing any authenticated users like subscriber to add any role to themselves, such as administrator | ||||
| CVE-2022-40291 | 1 Phppointofsale | 1 Php Point Of Sale | 2025-05-06 | 8.8 High |
| The application was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks, allowing an attacker to coerce users into sending malicious requests to the site to delete their account, or in rare circumstances, hijack their account and create other admin accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13118 | 1 Brijeshk89 | 1 Ip Based Login | 2025-05-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| The IP Based Login WordPress plugin before 2.4.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users delete all logs via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2022-40488 | 1 Processwire | 1 Processwire | 2025-05-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| ProcessWire v3.0.200 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2018-6336 | 1 Linuxfoundation | 1 Osquery | 2025-05-06 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in osquery. A maliciously crafted Universal/fat binary can evade third-party code signing checks. By not completing full inspection of the Universal/fat binary, the user of the third-party tool will believe that the code is signed by Apple, but the malicious unsigned code will execute. This issue affects osquery prior to v3.2.7 | ||||
| CVE-2024-24843 | 1 Powerpackelements | 1 Powerpack Addons For Elementor | 2025-05-06 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PowerPack Addons for Elementor PowerPack Pro for Elementor.This issue affects PowerPack Pro for Elementor: from n/a before 2.10.8. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24849 | 1 Developingtheweb | 1 Quicksand Post Filter Jquery | 2025-05-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mark Stockton Quicksand Post Filter jQuery Plugin.This issue affects Quicksand Post Filter jQuery Plugin: from n/a through 3.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24876 | 1 W-shadow | 1 Admin Menu Editor | 2025-05-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Janis Elsts Admin Menu Editor.This issue affects Admin Menu Editor: from n/a through 1.12. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25904 | 1 Blackbam | 1 Tinymce And Tinymce Advanced Professsional Formats And Styles | 2025-05-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in David Stockl TinyMCE and TinyMCE Advanced Professsional Formats and Styles.This issue affects TinyMCE and TinyMCE Advanced Professsional Formats and Styles: from n/a through 1.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24798 | 1 Soninow | 1 Debug | 2025-05-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SoniNow Team Debug.This issue affects Debug: from n/a through 1.10. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24802 | 1 Jtrt Responsive Tables Project | 1 Jtrt Responsive Tables | 2025-05-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in John Tendik JTRT Responsive Tables.This issue affects JTRT Responsive Tables: from n/a through 4.1.9. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5076 | 1 Tipsandtricks-hq | 1 Wp Emember | 2025-05-06 | 8.8 High |
| The wp-eMember WordPress plugin before 10.6.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks | ||||