| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Secure Elements Class 5 AVR (aka C5 EVM) client and server before 2.8.1 do not verify the integrity of a message digest, which allows remote attackers to modify and replay messages. |
| A filter in a router or firewall allows unusual fragmented packets. |
| Secure Elements Class 5 AVR (aka C5 EVM) 2.8.1 and earlier, and possibly later 2.8.x releases, uses the same initialization vector and key for each message session, which allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information about messages. |
| A WWW server is not running in a restricted file system, e.g. through a chroot, thus allowing access to system-critical data. |
| Secure Elements Class 5 AVR (aka C5 EVM) before 2.8.1 uses the same invariant RSA key for all installations, which allows remote attackers with the key to decrypt communications. |
| Secure Elements Class 5 AVR (aka C5 EVM) before 2.8.1 do not validate the source address of a message, which allows remote attackers to (1) execute arbitrary code on a client or (2) forge messages to the server. |
| There is a one-way or two-way trust relationship between Windows NT domains. |
| Secure Elements Class 5 AVR client (aka C5 EVM) before 2.8.1 allows remote attackers to read portions of process memory via a modified size for (1) EM_GET_CE_PARAMETER and (2) EM_SET_CE_PARAMETER messages, which leads to a buffer overflow (probably an over-read). |
| Secure Elements Class 5 AVR server (aka C5 EVM) before 2.8.1 does not validate the peer certificate when obtaining an update, which could allow remote attackers to distribute malicious updates to clients. |
| Secure Elements Class 5 AVR server (aka C5 EVM) before 2.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via forged "session start" messages that cause AVR to connect to arbitrary hosts. |
| A Windows NT system's file audit policy does not log an event success or failure for non-critical files or directories. |
| Secure Elements Class 5 AVR server (aka C5 EVM) before 2.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause an unspecified denial of service via a large number of forged client registration messages. |
| Secure Elements Class 5 AVR server and client (aka C5 EVM) before 2.8.1 send messages in cleartext, which allows remote attackers to read sensitive vulnerability information. |
| The RedCarpet command-line client (rug) does not verify SSL certificates from a server, which allows remote attackers to read network traffic and execute commands via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. |
| An attacker can force a printer to print arbitrary documents (e.g. if the printer doesn't require a password) or to become disabled. |
| vars.php in WordPress 2.0.2, possibly when running on Mac OS X, allows remote attackers to spoof their IP address via a PC_REMOTE_ADDR HTTP header, which vars.php uses to redefine $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']. |
| HP OpenMail can be misconfigured to allow users to run arbitrary commands using malicious print requests. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in EVA-Web 2.1.2 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) debut_image parameter in (a) article-album.php3, (2) date parameter in (b) rubrique.php3, and the (3) perso and (4) aide parameters to (c) an unknown script, probably index.php. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the employees node (class.employee.inc) in Achievo 1.1.0 and earlier and 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the atkselector parameter. |
| An SSH server allows authentication through the .rhosts file. |
