| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| HCL AION version 2 is affected by a JWT Token Expiry Too Long vulnerability. This may increase the risk of token misuse, potentially resulting in unauthorized access if the token is compromised. |
| HCL AION version 2 is affected by a Cacheable HTTP Response vulnerability. This may lead to unintended storage of sensitive or dynamic content, potentially resulting in unauthorized access or information disclosure. |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where certain identifiers may be predictable in nature. Predictable identifiers may allow an attacker to infer or guess system-generated values, potentially leading to limited information disclosure or unintended access under specific conditions. |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where model packaging and distribution mechanisms may not include sufficient authenticity verification. This may allow the possibility of unverified or modified model artifacts being used, potentially leading to integrity concerns or unintended behaviour. |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where untrusted file parsing operations are not executed within a properly isolated sandbox environment. This may expose the application to potential security risks, including unintended behaviour or integrity impact when processing specially crafted files. |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability related to the handling of upload size limits. Improper control or validation of upload sizes may allow excessive resource consumption, which could potentially lead to service degradation or denial-of-service conditions under certain scenarios. |
| HCL AION is affected by a Cookie with Insecure, Improper, or Missing SameSite vulnerability. This can allow cookies to be sent in cross-site requests, potentially increasing exposure to cross-site request forgery and related security risks. This issue affects AION: 2.0. |
| Root File System Not Mounted as Read-Only configuration vulnerability. This can allow unintended modifications to critical system files, potentially increasing the risk of system compromise or unauthorized changes.This issue affects AION: 2.0. |
| A Potential Command Injection vulnerability in HCL AION.
An This can allow unintended command execution, potentially leading to unauthorized actions on the underlying system.This issue affects AION: 2.0 |
| A vulnerability
Cacheable SSL Page Found vulnerability has been identified
in HCL AION.
Cached data may expose credentials, system identifiers, or internal file paths to attackers with access to the device or browser
This issue affects AION: 2.0. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking. |
| HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) Discovery is vulnerable to unenforced encryption due to port 80 (HTTP) being open, allowing unencrypted access. An attacker with access to the network traffic can sniff packets from the connection and uncover the data. |
| HCL BigFix Platform is affected by insecure permissions on private cryptographic keys. The private cryptographic keys located on a Windows host machine might be subject to overly permissive file system permissions. |
| HCL BigFix Platform is affected by insufficient authentication. The application might allow users to access sensitive areas of the application without proper authentication. |
| HCL Sametime for iOS is impacted by a sensitive information disclosure. Hostnames information is written in application logs and certain URLs. |
| A security vulnerability in HCL Compass can allow attacker to gain unauthorized database access. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint. |
| The BigFix SaaS's HTTP responses were missing some security headers. The absence of these headers weakens the application's client-side security posture, making it more vulnerable to common web attacks that these headers are designed to mitigate, such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Clickjacking, and protocol downgrade attacks. |
| The BigFix WebUI application responds with HOST information from the HTTP header field making it vulnerable to Host Header Poisoning Attacks. |
| The HTTP host header can be manipulated and cause the application to behave in unexpected ways. Any changes made to the header would cause the request to be sent to a completely different domain/IP address. |
