Export limit exceeded: 352003 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (81132 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-38482 | 1 Inhandnetworks | 2 Ir615, Ir615 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 8.7 High |
| InHand Networks IR615 Router's Versions 2.3.0.r4724 and 2.3.0.r4870 website used to control the router is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting, which may allow an attacker to hijack sessions of users connected to the system. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38481 | 1 Auvesy | 1 Versiondog | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| The scheduler service running on a specific TCP port enables the user to start and stop jobs. There is no sanitation of the supplied JOB ID provided to the function. An attacker may send a malicious payload that can enable the user to execute another SQL expression by sending a specific string. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38475 | 1 Auvesy | 1 Versiondog | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
| The database connection to the server is performed by calling a specific API, which could allow an unprivileged user to gain SYSDBA permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38473 | 1 Auvesy | 1 Versiondog | 2024-11-21 | 8 High |
| The affected product’s code base doesn’t properly control arguments for specific functions, which could lead to a stack overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38468 | 1 Inhandnetworks | 2 Ir615, Ir615 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 8.7 High |
| InHand Networks IR615 Router's Versions 2.3.0.r4724 and 2.3.0.r4870 are vulnerable to stored cross-scripting, which may allow an attacker to hijack sessions of users connected to the system. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38467 | 1 Auvesy | 1 Versiondog | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
| A specific function code receives a raw pointer supplied by the user and deallocates this pointer. The user can then control what memory regions will be freed and cause use-after-free condition. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38466 | 1 Inhandnetworks | 2 Ir615, Ir615 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| InHand Networks IR615 Router's Versions 2.3.0.r4724 and 2.3.0.r4870 do not perform sufficient input validation on client requests from the help page. This may allow an attacker to perform a reflected cross-site scripting attack, which could allow an attacker to run code on behalf of the client browser. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38465 | 1 Auvesy | 1 Versiondog | 2024-11-21 | 8 High |
| The webinstaller is a Golang web server executable that enables the generation of an Auvesy image agent. Resource consumption can be achieved by generating large amounts of installations, which are then saved without limitation in the temp folder of the webinstaller executable. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38463 | 1 Auvesy | 1 Versiondog | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
| The affected product does not properly control the allocation of resources. A user may be able to allocate unlimited memory buffers using API functions. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38461 | 1 Auvesy | 1 Versiondog | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| The affected product uses a hard-coded blowfish key for encryption/decryption processes. The key can be easily extracted from binaries. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38460 | 1 Moxa | 1 Mxview | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A path traversal vulnerability in the Moxa MXview Network Management software Versions 3.x to 3.2.2 may allow an attacker to create or overwrite critical files used to execute code, such as programs or libraries. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38459 | 1 Auvesy | 1 Versiondog | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| The data of a network capture of the initial handshake phase can be used to authenticate at a SYSDBA level. If a specific .exe is not restarted often, it is possible to access the needed handshake packets between admin/client connections. Using the SYSDBA permission, an attacker can change user passwords or delete the database. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38455 | 1 Auvesy | 1 Versiondog | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
| The affected product’s OS Service does not verify any given parameter. A user can supply any type of parameter that will be passed to inner calls without checking the type of the parameter or the value. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38452 | 1 Moxa | 1 Mxview | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A path traversal vulnerability in the Moxa MXview Network Management software Versions 3.x to 3.2.2 may allow an attacker to create or overwrite critical files used to execute code, such as programs or libraries. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38448 | 1 Trane | 6 Ascend Air-cooled Chiller Acr, Intellipak 1, Intellipak 2 and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The affected controllers do not properly sanitize the input containing code syntax. As a result, an attacker could craft code to alter the intended controller flow of the software. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38442 | 1 Fatek | 1 Winproladder | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| FATEK Automation WinProladder versions 3.30 and prior lacks proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing project files, which could result in a heap-corruption condition. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38438 | 1 Fatek | 1 Winproladder | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A use after free vulnerability in FATEK Automation WinProladder versions 3.30 and prior may be exploited when a valid user opens a malformed project file, which may allow arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38436 | 1 Fatek | 1 Winproladder | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| FATEK Automation WinProladder versions 3.30 and prior lacks proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing project files, which could result in a memory-corruption condition. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38434 | 1 Fatek | 1 Winproladder | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| FATEK Automation WinProladder versions 3.30 and prior lacks proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing project files, which could result in an unexpected sign extension. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38430 | 1 Fatek | 1 Winproladder | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| FATEK Automation WinProladder versions 3.30 and prior proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing project files, which could result in a stack-based buffer overflow. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. | ||||