| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| In versions below 2.2.1 of the Splunk Attack Analyzer Connector for Splunk SOAR, a user who holds a role with permission to run actions could expose a sensitive archive password by invoking either the detonate file or detonate url action, because the action's archive_password parameter is not masked and is shown in cleartext in the user interface. The information disclosure is possible because the app does not mark the affected action parameter as a password. For more information see Run an action in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/use-splunk-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/use-the-command-line-interface-to-perform-tasks-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/run-an-action-in-splunk-soar-on-premises). |
| In versions below 1.0.5 of the RSA SecurID Authentication Manager app for Splunk SOAR, a user who holds a role with permission to run actions could expose a sensitive token serial by invoking either the enable token or revoke token action, because the action's token_serial parameter is not masked and is shown in cleartext in the user interface. The information disclosure is possible because the app does not mark the affected action parameter as a password. For more information see Run an action in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/use-splunk-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/use-the-command-line-interface-to-perform-tasks-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/run-an-action-in-splunk-soar-on-premises). |
| In versions below 3.8.5 of the Phantom app for Splunk SOAR, a user who holds a role with permission to run actions could expose a sensitive archive password by invoking the deflate item action, because the action's password parameter is not masked and is shown in cleartext in the user interface. The information disclosure is possible because the app does not mark the affected action parameter as a password. For more information see Run an action in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/use-splunk-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/use-the-command-line-interface-to-perform-tasks-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/run-an-action-in-splunk-soar-on-premises). |
| In versions below 1.5.2 of the MS Graph for Active Directory app for Splunk SOAR, a user who holds a role with permission to run actions could expose a sensitive password by invoking the reset password action, because the action's temp_password parameter is not masked and is shown in cleartext in the user interface. The information disclosure is possible because the app does not mark the affected action parameter as a password. For more information see Run an action in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/use-splunk-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/use-the-command-line-interface-to-perform-tasks-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/run-an-action-in-splunk-soar-on-premises). |
| In versions below 5.1.3 of the CrowdStrike OAuth API app for Splunk SOAR, a user who holds a role with permission to run actions could expose a sensitive document password by invoking either the detonate file or detonate url action, because the action's document_password parameter is not masked and is shown in cleartext in the user interface. The information disclosure is possible because the app does not mark the affected action parameter as a password. For more information see Run an action in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/use-splunk-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/use-the-command-line-interface-to-perform-tasks-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/run-an-action-in-splunk-soar-on-premises). |
| Subscriber Arbitrary File Upload in IT Residence <= 3.2.1 versions. |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in revmakx InfiniteWP Client allows Blind SQL Injection.
This issue affects InfiniteWP Client: from n/a through 1.13.9. |
| Unauthenticated Broken Authentication in User Registration & Membership Pro <= 5.4.5 versions. |
| Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in FundEngine <= 1.7.9 versions. |
| Subscriber Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Query Wrangler <= 1.5.57 versions. |
| broot renders each file and directory name in its interactive tree view exactly as read from the filesystem. Names are converted with a plain to_string_lossy() call in src/tree_build/builder.rs and in TreeLine::unprune in src/tree/tree_line.rs, and no control-character filtering exists anywhere in the code, even though the doc comment on the TreeLine name field states that some characters may have been stripped. Any local user who can create a file can therefore place an escape sequence in its name and have it written unmodified to the terminal of anyone who browses that directory, between broot's own styling codes. A reported proof of concept used an OSC 52 clipboard-write sequence and captured the raw bytes broot wrote to its pty, confirming the sequence reaches the terminal unstripped. What an injected OSC or CSI sequence can then do depends on the terminal emulator in use. Browsing a directory is broot's primary function and carries no expectation that the content is trusted. |
| The Lean 4 kernel does not verify that the structure named in a projection expression matches the type of the value being projected, and environment::add_inductive in src/kernel/inductive.cpp did not type check the nested inductive applications that are replaced by auxiliary types, so their parametric arguments escaped checking. A metaprogram running in the Lean process can register an ill-typed nested inductive whose constructor applies a .proj C 0 projection to a value of the unrelated type W, and the kernel admits the declaration through the ordinary checked addDecl path at maximum kernel checking, without sorry, unsafeCast, debug.skipKernelTC, addDeclWithoutChecking, FFI, or a modified .olean file. The result is a type confusion yielding a proof of False that carries no axioms, from which any proposition can be derived. The published proof of concept additionally pads two expressions until their hashes and approximate depths collide, which defeats kernel caching; that is the technique used to reach the flaw, not its cause. Exploitation requires running a metaprogram in-process, for example by building a project or importing a malicious Lake dependency. |
| Unauthenticated SQL Injection in BookingPress Appointment Booking Pro <= 6.0.2 versions. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Halo CMS versions up to 2.25.4 via the CorsConfigurer.java and the CsrfConfigurer.java components. This allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. |
| An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the run.halo.app.migration.impl.MigrationServiceImpl.restoreWorkdir(), and org.springframework.util.FileSystemUtils.copyRecursively() components |
| Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation in Abandoned Cart Pro for WooCommerce <= 10.4.0 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Flatastic <= 2.0 versions. |
| Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Directory Pro <= 2.5.8 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Podlove Podcast Publisher <= 4.5.4 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Swatchly – WooCommerce Variation Swatches for Products <= 1.4.13 versions. |
