Export limit exceeded: 381951 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2680 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-54450 | 2026-04-15 | 9.4 Critical | ||
| An issue was discovered in Kurmi Provisioning Suite 7.9.0.33. If an X-Forwarded-For header is received during authentication, the Kurmi application will record the (possibly forged) IP address mentioned in that header rather than the real IP address that the user logged in from. This fake IP address can later be displayed in the My Account popup that shows the IP address that was used to log in. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7206 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| SSL Pinning Bypass in eWeLink Some hardware products allows local ATTACKER to Decrypt TLS communication and Extract secrets to clone the device via Flash the modified firmware | ||||
| CVE-2024-39337 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Click Studios Passwordstate Core before 9.8 build 9858 allows Authentication Bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31955 | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| An issue was discovered in Samsung eMMC with KLMAG2GE4A and KLM8G1WEMB firmware. Code bypass through Electromagnetic Fault Injection allows an attacker to successfully authenticate and write to the RPMB (Replay Protected Memory Block) area without possessing secret information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52919 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| In Yealink RPS before 2025-05-26, the certificate upload function does not properly validate certificate content, potentially allowing invalid certificates to be uploaded. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31122 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| scratch-coding-hut.github.io is the website for Coding Hut. In 1.0-beta3 and earlier, the login link can be used to login to any account by changing the username in the username field. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7390 | 1 Softing | 4 Edgeaggregator, Edgeconnector, Opc and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| A malicious client can bypass the client certificate trust check of an opc.https server when the server endpoint is configured to allow only secure communication. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6030 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Use of fixed learning codes, one code to lock the car and the other code to unlock it, in the Key Fob Transmitter in Cyclone Matrix TRF Smart Keyless Entry System, which allows a replay attack. Research was completed on the 2024 KIA Soluto. Attack confirmed on other KIA Models in Ecuador. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0501 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An issue in the native clients for Amazon WorkSpaces (when running PCoIP protocol) may allow an attacker to access remote sessions via man-in-the-middle. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30000 | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens License Server (SLS) (All versions < V4.3). The affected application does not properly restrict permissions of the users. This could allow a lowly-privileged attacker to escalate their privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12797 | 1 Redhat | 5 Discovery, Enterprise Linux, Logging and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode is set. Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not detected by clients. RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate chain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys, by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER. Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2. The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71056 | 1 Szgcom | 1 Gcom Epon 1ge Onu | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Improper session management in GCOM EPON 1GE ONU version C00R371V00B01 allows attackers to execute a session hijacking attack via spoofing the IP address of an authenticated user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25055 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Authentication bypass by spoofing issue exists in FileMegane versions above 1.0.0.0 prior to 3.4.0.0, which may lead to user impersonation. If exploited, restricted file contents may be accessed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-37147 | 1 Hpe | 1 Arubaos | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| A Secure Boot Bypass Vulnerability exists in affected Access Points that allows an adversary to bypass the hardware root of trust verification in place to ensure only vendor-signed firmware can execute on the device. An adversary can exploit this vulnerability to run modified or custom firmware on affected Access Points. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30189 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6) (All versions), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA6) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB6) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (6GK5778-1GY00-0TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA) (6GK5778-1GY00-0TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TC0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AC0) (All versions). This CVE refers to Scenario 1 "Leak frames from the Wi-Fi queue" of CVE-2022-47522. Affected devices queue frames in order to subsequently change the security context and leak the queued frames. This could allow a physically proximate attacker to intercept (possibly cleartext) target-destined frames. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34065 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in AVTECH IP camera, DVR, and NVR devices’ streamd web server. The strstr() function allows unauthenticated access to any request containing "/nobody" in the URL, bypassing login controls. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38284 | 1 Motorolasolutions | 1 Vigilant Fixed Lpr Coms Box | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Transmitted data is logged between the device and the backend service. An attacker could use these logs to perform a replay attack to replicate calls. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54810 | 1 Cognex | 2 In-sight Camera Firmware, In-sight Explorer | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| Cognex In-Sight Explorer and In-Sight Camera Firmware expose a proprietary protocol on TCP port 1069 to perform management operations such as modifying system properties. The user management functionality handles sensitive data such as registered usernames and passwords over an unencrypted channel, allowing an adjacent attacker to intercept valid credentials to gain access to the device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37016 | 1 Mengshen | 1 M70 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| Mengshen Wireless Door Alarm M70 2024-05-24 allows Authentication Bypass via a Capture-Replay approach. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2183 | 1 Palo Alto Networks | 1 Globalprotect App | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An insufficient certificate validation issue in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app enables attackers to connect the GlobalProtect app to arbitrary servers. This can enable a local non-administrative operating system user or an attacker on the same subnet to install malicious root certificates on the endpoint and subsequently install malicious software signed by the malicious root certificates on that endpoint. | ||||