| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in Rocket.Chat <v5 due to the getUserMentionsByChannel meteor server method discloses messages from private channels and direct messages regardless of the users access permission to the room. |
| The Ldap WP Login / Active Directory Integration WordPress plugin before 3.0.2 does not have any authorisation and CSRF checks when updating it's settings (which are hooked to the init action), allowing unauthenticated attackers to update them. Attackers could set their own LDAP server to be used to authenticated users, therefore bypassing the current authentication |
| The WP Popup Builder WordPress plugin before 1.2.9 does not have authorisation and CSRF check in an AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscribers to delete arbitrary Popup |
| The Scripts Organizer WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have capability and CSRF checks in the saveScript AJAX action, available to both unauthenticated and authenticated users, and does not validate user input in any way, which could allow unauthenticated users to put arbitrary PHP code in a file |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Outside In Core). Supported versions that are affected are 8.5.6 and 8.5.7. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Outside In Technology executes to compromise Oracle Outside In Technology. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Outside In Technology accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Outside In Technology accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Outside In Technology. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). |
| Inappropriate implementation in Chrome OS lockscreen in Google Chrome on Chrome OS prior to 105.0.5195.52 allowed a local attacker to bypass lockscreen navigation restrictions via physical access to the device. |
| A tenant administrator Hitachi Content Platform (HCP) may modify the configuration in another tenant without authorization, potentially allowing unauthorized access to data in the other tenant. Also, a tenant user (non-administrator) may view configuration in another tenant without authorization. This issue affects: Hitachi Vantara Hitachi Content Platform versions prior to 8.3.7; 9.0.0 versions prior to 9.2.3. |
| Zammad 5.2.1 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Zammad's asset handling mechanism has logic to ensure that customer users are not able to see personal information of other users. This logic was not effective when used through a web socket connection, so that a logged-in attacker would be able to fetch personal data of other users by querying the Zammad API. This issue is fixed in , 5.2.2. |
| Smart eVision has insufficient authorization for task acquisition function. An unauthorized remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to acquire the Session IDs of other general users only. |
| Smart eVision has inadequate authorization for the database query function. A remote attacker with general user privilege, who is not explicitly authorized to access the information, can access sensitive information. |
| smart eVision has inadequate authorization for system information query function. An unauthenticated remote attacker, who is not explicitly authorized to access the information, can access sensitive information. |
| An issue was discovered in Optimizely Configured Commerce before 5.2.2408. For newly created accounts, the Commerce B2B application does not require email confirmation. This medium-severity issue allows the mass creation of accounts. This could affect database storage; also, non-requested storefront accounts can be created on behalf of visitors. |
| Redpanda before 23.1.21 and 23.2.x before 23.2.18 has missing authorization checks in the Transactions API. |
| The H5P activity attempts report did not filter by groups, which in separate groups mode could reveal information to non-editing teachers about attempts/users in groups they should not have access to. |
| The Bookster WordPress plugin through 1.1.0 allows adding sensitive parameters when validating appointments allowing attackers to manipulate the data sent when booking an appointment (the request body) to change its status from pending to approved. |
| Zoho ManageEngine ADAudit Plus versions 7260 and below allows unauthorized local agent machine users to access sensitive information and modifying the agent configuration. |
| The ArtPlacer Widget WordPress plugin before 2.21.2 does not have authorisation check in place when deleting widgets, allowing ay authenticated users, such as subscriber, to delete arbitrary widgets |
| In soundrecorder service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to elevation of privilege in contacts service with no additional execution privileges needed. |
| phpMyFAQ is an Open Source FAQ web application for PHP 8.1+ and MySQL, PostgreSQL and other databases. The 'sharing FAQ' functionality allows any unauthenticated actor to misuse the phpMyFAQ application to send arbitrary emails to a large range of targets. The phpMyFAQ application has a functionality where anyone can share a FAQ item to others. The front-end of this functionality allows any phpMyFAQ articles to be shared with 5 email addresses. Any unauthenticated actor can perform this action. There is a CAPTCHA in place, however the amount of people you email with a single request is not limited to 5 by the backend. An attacker can thus solve a single CAPTCHA and send thousands of emails at once. An attacker can utilize the target application's email server to send phishing messages. This can get the server on a blacklist, causing all emails to end up in spam. It can also lead to reputation damages. This issue has been patched in version 3.2.5. |
| In Music service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service in Music service with no additional execution privileges needed. |
