| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61457. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61457. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61457 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61453. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61453. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61453 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61452. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61452. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61452 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61451. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61451. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61451 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61446. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61446. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61446 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61449. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61449. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61449 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61443. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61443. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61443 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61440. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61440. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61440 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61438. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61438. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61438 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61436. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61436. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61436 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61435. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61435. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61435 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61430. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61430. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61430 instead of this candidate. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61433. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61433. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61433 instead of this candidate. |
| Vitest is a testing framework powered by Vite. From 4.0.17 until 4.1.6 and 5.0.0-beta.3, Vitest Browser Mode served /__vitest_test__/ with the otelCarrier query parameter inserted directly into an inline module script, allowing a crafted browser-runner URL to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the Vitest server origin and recover VITEST_API_TOKEN for authenticated API calls. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.6 and 5.0.0-beta.3. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows NTFS allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Buffer over-read in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Composite Image File System Driver allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Insertion of sensitive information into log file in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in TRENDnet TEW-821DAP 1.12B01. Impacted is the function sub_41EC14 of the file /goform/tools_nslookup of the component ssi. The manipulation of the argument nslookup_target leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The vendor explains: "We are unable to confirm the existence of the vulnerabilities for (...) TEW-821DAP (v1.0R) as these items have been EOL. " This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Spaceport.sys allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack. |