Export limit exceeded: 398479 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 398479 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (101068 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-71923 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the auth_set function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71918 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the webBackupAction function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the option, key, pw_encode, pathN, and valueN fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71913 | 1 Draytek | 12 Vigorap 1060c, Vigorap 1060c Firmware, Vigorap 903 and 9 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the upload_settings.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering before the restorekey field is concatenated into a shell command. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71908 | 1 Draytek | 12 Vigorap 1060c, Vigorap 1060c Firmware, Vigorap 903 and 9 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the mesh_start_speed_test function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient sanitization of the meshdevice_index and meshdevice_ip fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71506 | 1 Dolibarr | 1 Dolibarr | 2026-08-26 | 8.1 High |
| Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the payments REST API delete endpoint that allows authenticated attackers with invoice-deletion rights to permanently delete any payment record by bypassing the intended payment-issuance rights check. Attackers can exploit this misconfigured permission check to zero paid amounts on invoices and remove entries from accounting exports, causing financial data integrity loss. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56709 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav | 2026-08-26 | 7.5 High |
| Grav before 3.9.2 fails to validate untrusted Host headers in the sendInvitationEmail() function when constructing token-bearing invitation links. Attackers can manipulate the Host header to poison invitation links and redirect users to attacker-controlled domains, bypassing the require_trusted_host protection which only covers password reset flows. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48388 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Photoshop Installer, Photoshop Installer | 2026-08-26 | 8.6 High |
| Adobe Photoshop Installer was affected by an Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability that could have resulted in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could have exploited this vulnerability by placing a malicious library in a directory searched by the installer. Exploitation of this issue required user interaction in that a victim must have been running the installer. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78944 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-78950 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-78956 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-78963 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Improper input validation in Media in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-78899 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-78913 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-08-26 | 8.1 High |
| Use after free in Chromoting in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-59887 | 1 Markdown-it | 1 Linkify-it | 2026-08-26 | 7.5 High |
| linkify-it is a links recognition library with full Unicode support. Prior to 5.0.2, the mailto: schema validator used by .test() and .match() can be invoked at every mailto: occurrence and scan the remaining input through src_email_name in lib/re.mjs, causing O(n^2) CPU consumption on crafted user text. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58192 | 1 Appium | 2 Appium, Appium\/storage-plugin | 2026-08-26 | 8.6 High |
| Appium is a cross-platform automation framework for all kinds of apps, built on top of the W3C WebDriver protocol. Prior to 1.1.6, the Appium storage plugin exposes POST /storage/delete, whose handler passes the user-supplied name value directly into path.join(storageRoot, name) and fs.rimraf() without path sanitization, allowing an unauthenticated remote client to escape the storage root with ../ sequences and recursively delete arbitrary writable files or directories. This issue is fixed in version 1.1.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59723 | 1 Cline | 1 Cline | 2026-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76391 | 1 Splunk | 1 Ai Toolkit | 2026-08-26 | 8.3 High |
| In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 6.0.0, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could run searches with system-level privileges, access all relevant data, affect system integrity, and read or delete search jobs belonging to other users through Agent Run History. The improper privilege management is possible because the Agent Run History handler replaces the calling user session key with a system authentication token before it performs search operations. For more information see AI Toolkit Agent Launchpad (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/apply-machine-learning/use-ai-toolkit/6.0.0/ai-toolkit-connections-containers-and-agents/ai-toolkit-agent-launchpad) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76355 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-08-26 | 7.5 High |
| In Splunk Enterprise 10.4 versions below 10.4.2, an unauthenticated user could retrieve the information contained in Edge Processor pipeline configurations through a Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoint when Edge Processor is turned on. The vulnerability does not affect versions prior to 10.4. The vulnerability exists because the Edge Processor service endpoint lacks authentication controls. For more information see System architecture of the Edge Processor solution (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/process-data-at-the-edge/use-edge-processors-for-splunk-enterprise/10.4/how-the-edge-processor-solution-works/system-architecture-of-the-edge-processor-solution) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76344 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-08-26 | 7.7 High |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could write dispatch metadata to an arbitrary location on the host by supplying a crafted search identifier to a Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoint and affect system integrity on the host. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Enterprise does not validate the search identifier before using it to create a dispatch directory. For more information see About configuring role-based user access (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/about-configuring-role-based-user-access) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76336 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-08-26 | 7.1 High |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2 and 10.2.6, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could delete all Search Processing Language 2 (SPL2) modules across all apps and users on the instance through the SPL2 module management Representational State Transfer (REST) API. This could delete exported datasets and functions, affect system integrity, and cause partial service disruption. The vulnerability does not affect Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2. The vulnerability is possible because the SPL2 module management REST API does not sufficiently authorize and validate module deletion requests. For more information see Manage SPL2 modules (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/spl2-search-manual/multiple-searches-in-an-spl2-module/manage-spl2-modules) and Module permissions (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/spl2-search-manual/modules-statements-and-views/module-permissions) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||