Search Results (346723 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-5514 1 Minmax 1 Minmax 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
MinMax CMS from MinMax Digital Technology contains a hidden administrator account with a fixed password that cannot be removed or disabled from the management interface. Remote attackers who obtain this account can bypass IP access control restrictions and log in to the backend system without being recorded in the system logs.
CVE-2024-5535 2 Openssl, Redhat 7 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 4 more 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.
CVE-2024-5540 1 Carrier 2 Automatedlogic Webctrl, I-vu 2026-04-15 N/A
The reflective cross-site scripting vulnerability found in ALC WebCTRL and Carrier i-Vu in versions older than 8.0 affects login panels allowing a malicious actor to compromise the client browser .
CVE-2024-55407 2026-04-15 7.8 High
An issue in the DeviceloControl function of ITE Tech. Inc ITE IO Access v1.0.0.0 allows attackers to perform arbitrary port read and write actions via supplying crafted IOCTL requests.
CVE-2024-55408 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
An improper access control vulnerability in the AsusSAIO.sys driver may lead to the misuse of software functionality utilizing the driver when crafted IOCTL requests are supplied.
CVE-2024-55411 2026-04-15 8.8 High
An issue in the snxpcamd.sys component of SUNIX Multi I/O Card v10.1.0.0 allows attackers to perform arbitrary read and write actions via supplying crafted IOCTL requests.
CVE-2024-55413 2026-04-15 7.8 High
A vulnerability exits in driver snxppamd.sys in SUNIX Parallel Driver x64 - 10.1.0.0, which allows low-privileged users to read and write arbitary i/o port via specially crafted IOCTL requests . This can be exploited for privilege escalation, code execution under high privileges, and information disclosure. These signed drivers can also be used to bypass the Microsoft driver-signing policy to deploy malicious code.
CVE-2024-55414 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
A vulnerability exits in driver SmSerl64.sys in Motorola SM56 Modem WDM Driver v6.12.23.0, which allows low-privileged users to mapping physical memory via specially crafted IOCTL requests . This can be exploited for privilege escalation, code execution under high privileges, and information disclosure. These signed drivers can also be used to bypass the Microsoft driver-signing policy to deploy malicious code.
CVE-2024-55457 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
MasterSAM Star Gate 11 is vulnerable to directory traversal via /adama/adama/downloadService. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the file parameter to access arbitrary files on the server, potentially exposing sensitive information.
CVE-2024-55471 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
Oqtane Framework is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in Oqtane.Controllers.UserController. This allows unauthorized users to access sensitive information of other users by manipulating the id parameter.
CVE-2024-55494 2026-04-15 6.1 Medium
A PHP Code Injection vulnerability that can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) and XSS in Opencode Mobile Collect Call v5.4.7 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the op_func parameter at /occontrolpanel/index.php.
CVE-2024-55500 2026-04-15 8.8 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Avenwu Whistle v.2.9.90 and before allows attackers to perform malicious API calls, resulting in the execution of arbitrary code on the victim's machine.
CVE-2024-55504 2026-04-15 5.5 Medium
An issue in RAR Extractor - Unarchiver Free and Pro v.6.4.0 allows local attackers to inject arbitrary code potentially leading to remote control and unauthorized access to sensitive user data via the exploit_combined.dylib component on MacOS.
CVE-2024-55511 2026-04-15 7.8 High
A null pointer dereference vulnerability in Macrium Reflect prior to 8.1.8017 allows a local attacker to cause a system crash or potentially elevate their privileges via executing a specially crafted executable.
CVE-2024-55517 2026-04-15 8.8 High
An issue was discovered in the Interllect Core Search in Polaris FT Intellect Core Banking 9.5. Input passed through the groupType parameter in /SCGController is mishandled before being used in SQL queries, allowing SQL injection in an authenticated session.
CVE-2024-55539 2026-04-15 N/A
Weak algorithm used to sign RPM package. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux) before build 39185, Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux) before build 39938.
CVE-2024-55542 2026-04-15 N/A
Local privilege escalation due to excessive permissions assigned to Tray Monitor service. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 39169, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 35895.
CVE-2024-55566 2026-04-15 6.6 Medium
ColPack 1.0.10 through 9a7293a has a predictable temporary file (located under /tmp with a name derived from an unseeded RNG). The impact can be overwriting files or making ColPack graphing unavailable to other users.
CVE-2024-55554 2026-04-15 5.4 Medium
Intrexx Portal Server before 12.0.2 allows XSS via a user-defined portlet.
CVE-2024-55555 2026-04-15 8.8 High
Invoice Ninja before 5.10.43 allows remote code execution from a pre-authenticated route when an attacker knows the APP_KEY. This is exacerbated by .env files, available from the product's repository, that have default APP_KEY values. The route/{hash} route defined in the invoiceninja/routes/client.php file can be accessed without authentication. The parameter {hash} is passed to the function decrypt that expects a Laravel ciphered value containing a serialized object. (Furthermore, Laravel contains several gadget chains usable to trigger remote command execution from arbitrary deserialization.) Therefore, an attacker in possession of the APP_KEY is able to fully control a string passed to an unserialize function.