| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Improper input validation in firmware for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi in multiple operating systems and some Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in firmware for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi in multiple operating systems and some Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Improper input validation in firmware for Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi in multiple operating systems and Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access. |
| Improper Validation of Consistency within input in software for Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi and Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. |
| Improper input validation in software for Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi and Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. |
| Improper input validation in firmware for Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi in multiple operating systems and Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Improper input validation in the BIOS authenticated code module for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable aescalation of privilege via local access. |
| Improper input validation in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Improper input validation in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable aescalation of privilege via local access. |
| Improper input validation for the Intel(R) Manageability Commander before version 2.2 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. |
| Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input in firmware for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi in multiple operating systems and some Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. |
| Improper input validation in firmware for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi in multiple operating systems and some Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. |
| Improper input validation in firmware for Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless Wi-Fi in multiple operating systems and Killer(TM) Wi-Fi in Windows 10 and 11 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Certain Lexmark devices through 2023-02-19 mishandle Input Validation (issue 2 of 4). |
| The Gutenberg Template Library & Redux Framework plugin <= 4.2.11 for WordPress registered several AJAX actions available to unauthenticated users in the `includes` function in `redux-core/class-redux-core.php` that were unique to a given site but deterministic and predictable given that they were based on an md5 hash of the site URL with a known salt value of '-redux' and an md5 hash of the previous hash with a known salt value of '-support'. These AJAX actions could be used to retrieve a list of active plugins and their versions, the site's PHP version, and an unsalted md5 hash of site’s `AUTH_KEY` concatenated with the `SECURE_AUTH_KEY`. |
|
IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, 21.0.4, and 21.0.5 is vulnerable to exposure of the first tenant owner e-mail address to users with access to the container platform. IBM X-Force ID: 238214.
|
| The package muhammara before 2.6.0; all versions of package hummus are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) when PDFStreamForResponse() is used with invalid data. |
| systemd 242 changes the VT1 mode upon a logout, which allows attackers to read cleartext passwords in certain circumstances, such as watching a shutdown, or using Ctrl-Alt-F1 and Ctrl-Alt-F2. This occurs because the KDGKBMODE (aka current keyboard mode) check is mishandled. |
| In drivers/char/virtio_console.c in the Linux kernel before 5.13.4, data corruption or loss can be triggered by an untrusted device that supplies a buf->len value exceeding the buffer size. NOTE: the vendor indicates that the cited data corruption is not a vulnerability in any existing use case; the length validation was added solely for robustness in the face of anomalous host OS behavior |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read
[BUG]
There is a syzbot crash, triggered by the ASSERT() during subvolume
creation:
assertion failed: !anon_dev, in fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1319
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1319!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_root_ref.part.0+0x9aa/0xa60
<TASK>
btrfs_get_new_fs_root+0xd3/0xf0
create_subvol+0xd02/0x1650
btrfs_mksubvol+0xe95/0x12b0
__btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x2f9/0x4f0
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16b/0x200
btrfs_ioctl+0x35f0/0x5cf0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x210
do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xe0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[CAUSE]
During create_subvol(), after inserting root item for the newly created
subvolume, we would trigger btrfs_get_new_fs_root() to get the
btrfs_root of that subvolume.
The idea here is, we have preallocated an anonymous device number for
the subvolume, thus we can assign it to the new subvolume.
But there is really nothing preventing things like backref walk to read
the new subvolume.
If that happens before we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root(), the subvolume
would be read out, with a new anonymous device number assigned already.
In that case, we would trigger ASSERT(), as we really expect no one to
read out that subvolume (which is not yet accessible from the fs).
But things like backref walk is still possible to trigger the read on
the subvolume.
Thus our assumption on the ASSERT() is not correct in the first place.
[FIX]
Fix it by removing the ASSERT(), and just free the @anon_dev, reset it
to 0, and continue.
If the subvolume tree is read out by something else, it should have
already get a new anon_dev assigned thus we only need to free the
preallocated one. |
