Export limit exceeded: 343912 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9090 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-7273 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Owncloud | 2024-10-04 | 6.8 Medium |
| Cross site request forgery in Kiteworks OwnCloud allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge requests. If a request has no Authorization header, it is created with an empty string as value by a rewrite rule. The CSRF check is done by comparing the header value to null, meaning that the existing CSRF check is bypassed in this case. An attacker can, for example, create a new administrator account if the request is executed in the browser of an authenticated victim. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42504 | 2024-10-04 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall Agent products could be exploited remotely to cause a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the login flow. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20414 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2024-10-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web UI feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system through the web UI. This vulnerability is due to incorrectly accepting configuration changes through the HTTP GET method. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a currently authenticated administrator to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to change the configuration of the affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47082 | 1 Strawberryrocks | 1 Strawberry | 2024-10-01 | 4.6 Medium |
| Strawberry GraphQL is a library for creating GraphQL APIs. Prior to version 0.243.0, multipart file upload support as defined in the GraphQL multipart request specification was enabled by default in all Strawberry HTTP view integrations. This made all Strawberry HTTP view integrations vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks if users did not explicitly enable CSRF preventing security mechanism for their servers. Additionally, the Django HTTP view integration, in particular, had an exemption for Django's built-in CSRF protection (i.e., the `CsrfViewMiddleware` middleware) by default. In affect, all Strawberry integrations were vulnerable to CSRF attacks by default. Version `v0.243.0` is the first `strawberry-graphql` including a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7862 | 2 Blogintroduction Wordpress Plugin, Kimhuebel | 2 Blogintroduction Wordpress Plugin, Blogintroduction-wordpress-plugin | 2024-09-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| The blogintroduction-wordpress-plugin WordPress plugin through 0.3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-3083 | 1 Proges | 2 Sensor Net Connect Firmware V2, Sensor Net Connect V2 | 2024-09-30 | 8.3 High |
| A “CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)” can be exploited by remote attackers to perform state-changing operations with administrative privileges by luring authenticated victims into visiting a malicious web page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8044 | 2 Rubayathasan, Wordpress Plugin | 2 Infolinks Ad Wrap, Infolinks Ad Wrap | 2024-09-30 | 5.7 Medium |
| The infolinks Ad Wrap WordPress plugin through 1.0.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-7863 | 1 Pixeljar | 1 Favicon Generator | 2024-09-27 | 8.1 High |
| The Favicon Generator (CLOSED) WordPress plugin before 2.1 does not validate files to be uploaded and does not have CSRF checks, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin upload arbitrary files such as PHP on the server | ||||
| CVE-2024-7864 | 1 Pixeljar | 1 Favicon Generator | 2024-09-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Favicon Generator (CLOSED) WordPress plugin before 2.1 does not have CSRF and path validation in the output_sub_admin_page_0() function, allowing attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary files on the server | ||||
| CVE-2024-7817 | 2 Michalaugustyniak, Misiek Photo Album | 2 Misiek Photo Album, Misiek Photo Album | 2024-09-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Misiek Photo Album WordPress plugin through 1.4.3 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users delete arbitrary albums via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-8043 | 2 Seanschulte, Wordpress Plugin | 2 Vikinghammer Tweet, Vikinghammer Tweet | 2024-09-27 | 5.7 Medium |
| The Vikinghammer Tweet WordPress plugin through 0.2.4 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8051 | 2 Moc, Wordpress Plugin | 2 Special Feed Items, Special Feed Items | 2024-09-27 | 5.7 Medium |
| The Special Feed Items WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8091 | 2 Jakesnyder, Jupitercow | 2 Enhanced Search Box, Enhanced Search Box | 2024-09-27 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Enhanced Search Box WordPress plugin through 0.6.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-8092 | 2 Alaingg, Alaingonzalez | 2 Accordion Image Menu, Accordion Image Menu | 2024-09-27 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Accordion Image Menu WordPress plugin through 3.1.3 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8093 | 2 Lucas Garcia, Lucasgarcia | 2 Posts Reminder, Posts Reminder | 2024-09-27 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Posts reminder WordPress plugin through 0.20 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-7820 | 2 Elliot, Ilc Thickbox | 2 Ilc Thickbox, Ilc Thickbox | 2024-09-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| The ILC Thickbox WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-8052 | 2 Joen, Moc | 2 Review Ratings, Review Ratings | 2024-09-27 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Review Ratings WordPress plugin through 1.6 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7816 | 2 Adeelraza, Gixaw Chat | 2 Gixaw Chat, Gixaw Chat | 2024-09-26 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Gixaw Chat WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3163 | 2 Easy Property Listings, Realestateconnected | 2 Easy Property Listings, Easy Property Listings | 2024-09-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Easy Property Listings WordPress plugin before 3.5.4 does not have CSRF check when deleting contacts in bulk, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-46086 | 1 Frogcms Project | 1 Frogcms | 2024-09-25 | 8.8 High |
| FrogCMS V0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/plugin/file_manager/delete/123 | ||||