| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in webadmin.nsf for Lotus Domino R6 6.5.1 allows attackers to create and detect directories via a .. (dot dot) in the directory creation command. |
| Lotus Domino R5 and R6 WebMail, with "Generate HTML for all fields" enabled, stores sensitive data from names.nsf in hidden form fields, which allows remote attackers to read the HTML source to obtain sensitive information such as (1) the password hash in the HTTPPassword field, (2) the password change date in the HTTPPasswordChangeDate field, (3) the client platform in the ClntPltfrm field, (4) the client machine name in the ClntMachine field, and (5) the client Lotus Domino release in the ClntBld field, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2696. |
| IBM Lotus Domino Server 7.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a crafted packet to the LDAP port (389/TCP). |
| IBM Lotus Notes does not properly restrict access to password hashes in the Notes Address Book (NAB), which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the (1) password digest field in the Administration tab of a Lotus Notes client, (2) "PasswordDigest" and "HTTPPassword" fields in the document properties in the NAB, or (3) a direct query to the Domino LDAP server, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2428. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Lotus Domino iNotes Client 6.5.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via email with attached html files, which are directly rendered in the browser. |
| NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the vendor. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes R6 and Domino R6, and possibly earlier versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary web script or HTML via square brackets at the beginning and end of (1) computed for display, (2) computed when composed, or (3) computed text element fields. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this issue, saying that it is not a problem with Notes/Domino itself, but with the applications that do not properly handle this feature |
| Multiple unknown vulnerabilities in IBM Lotus Notes 6.5.x before 6.5.4 and 6.0.x before 6.0.5 have unknown impact and attack vectors, related to Java applets, as identified by (1) KSPR5YS6GR and (2) KSPR62F4D3. |
| The "Add Sender to Address Book" operation (AddSenderToAddressBook.lss) and NameHelper.lss in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0 and 6.5 before 20060331 do not properly store information in the Personal Address Book when multiple messages are checked and a message uses AltFrom, which might allow user-assisted remote attackers to trick a user into sending e-mail to an unauthorized recipient. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in webadmin.nsf in Lotus Domino R6 6.5.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a Domino command in the Quick Console. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Lotus Domino iNotes Client 6.5.4 and 7.0 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) an email subject; (2) an encoded javascript URI, as demonstrated using "java script:"; or (3) when the Domino Web Access ActiveX control is not installed, via an email attachment filename. |
| Lotus Domino Web Server (nhttp.exe) before 6.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a "Fictionary Value Field POST request" as demonstrated using the s_Validation form with a long, unknown parameter name. |
| IBM Lotus Notes 6.5.4 and 6.5.5, and 7.0.0 and 7.0.1, uses insecure default permissions (Everyone/Full Control) for the "Notes" folder and all children, which allows local users to gain privileges and modify, add, or delete files in that folder. |
| Lotus Domino Web Server (nhttp.exe) before 6.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via an incomplete POST request, as demonstrated using the h_PageUI form. |
| The LDAP server (nldap.exe) in IBM Lotus Domino before 7.0.1, 6.5.5, and 6.5.4 FP2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long bind request, which triggers a null dereference. |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Autonomy (formerly Verity) KeyView SDK before 9.2.0, as used in Lotus Notes 6.5.4 and 7.0, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a UUE file containing an encoded file with a long filename handled by uudrdr.dll, (2) a compressed ZIP file with a long filename handled by kvarcve.dll, (3) a TAR archive with a long filename that is extracted to a directory with a long path handled by the TAR reader (tarrdr.dll), (4) an email that contains a long HTTP, FTP, or // link handled by the HTML speed reader (htmsr.dll) or (5) an email containing a crafted long link handled by the HTML speed reader (htmsr.dll). |
| Lotus Domino 5.0.8 web server returns different error messages when a valid or invalid user is provided in HTTP requests, which allows remote attackers to determine valid user names and makes it easier to conduct brute force attacks. |
| Buffer overflow in Web Retriever client for Lotus Notes/Domino R4.5 through R6 allows remote malicious web servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long HTTP status line. |
| Argument injection vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0.3 and 6.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a notes: URI that uses a UNC network share pathname to provide an alternate notes.ini configuration file to notes.exe. |
| Multiple buffer overflows in Lotus Domino Web Server before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via (1) the s_ViewName option in the PresetFields parameter for iNotes, (2) the Foldername option in the PresetFields parameter for iNotes, or (3) a long Host header, which is inserted into a long Location header and used during a redirect operation. |
| NLSCCSTR.DLL in the web service in IBM Lotus Domino Server 6.5.1, 6.0.3, and possibly other versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (deep recursion and nHTTP.exe process crash) via a long GET request containing UNICODE decimal value 430 characters, which causes the stack to be exhausted. NOTE: IBM has reported that it is unable to replicate this issue. |
