| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| SiYuan is a personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.6.4, a malicious note synced to another user can trigger remote code execution in the SiYuan Electron desktop client. The root cause is that table caption content is stored without safe escaping and later unescaped into rendered HTML, creating a stored XSS sink. Because the desktop renderer runs with nodeIntegration enabled and contextIsolation disabled, attacker-controlled JavaScript executes with access to Node.js APIs. In practice, an attacker can import a crafted note into a synced workspace, wait for the victim to sync, and achieve code execution when the victim opens the note. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.6.4. |
| Emmett is a full-stack Python web framework designed with simplicity. From 2.5.0 to before 2.8.1, the RSGI static handler for Emmett's internal assets (/__emmett__ paths) is vulnerable to path traversal attacks. An attacker can use ../ sequences (eg /__emmett__/../rsgi/handlers.py) to read arbitrary files outside the assets directory. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.8.1. |
| An insufficient granularity of access control vulnerability exists in PingIDM (formerly ForgeRock Identity Management) where administrators cannot properly configure access rules for Remote Connector Servers (RCS) running in client mode. This means attackers can spoof a client-mode RCS (if one exists) to intercept and/or modify an identity’s security-relevant properties, such as passwords and account recovery information. This issue is exploitable only when an RCS is configured to run in client mode. |
| Tenda AC6 15.03.05.16_multi is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formSetCfm function via the funcname, funcpara1, and funcpara2 parameters. |
| D-Link DI-8003 v16.07.26A1, DI-8500 v16.07.26A1; DI-8003G v17.12.21A1, DI-8200G v17.12.20A1, DI-8200 v16.07.26A1, DI-8400 v16.07.26A1, DI-8004w v16.07.26A1, DI-8100 v16.07.26A1, and DI-8100G v17.12.20A1 were discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the rd_en, rd_auth, rd_acct, http_hadmin, http_hadminpwd, rd_key, and rd_ip parameters in the radius_asp function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted request. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of multiple parameters in the /web_post.asp endpoint. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request in parameters such as name, en, user_id, log, and time. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 and DI-8003G 19.12.10A1 due to improper handling of the wan_ping parameter in the /wan_ping.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the http_lanport parameter in the /webgl.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper validation of user input in the qj.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to inadequate input validation in the /tggl.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper validation of the id parameter in the /thd_member.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the custom_error parameter in the /user.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of the name parameter in the /url_group.asp endpoint. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link DI-8003 16.07.26A1 due to improper handling of input parameters in the /web_keyword.asp endpoint. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP GET request via the name, en, time, mem_gb2312, and mem_utf8 parameters. |
| When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool. |
| SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. |
| The LightPress Lightbox plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the `group` attribute in the `[gallery]` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.4. This is due to the plugin modifying gallery shortcode output to include the `group` attribute value without proper escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| The TableOn – WordPress Posts Table Filterable plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'tableon_button' shortcode in all versions up to and including 1.0.4.4. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user-supplied shortcode attributes such as 'class', 'help_link', 'popup_title', and 'help_title'. The do_shortcode_button() function extracts these attributes without sanitization and passes them to TABLEON_HELPER::draw_html_item(), which concatenates attribute values into HTML using single quotes without escaping (line 29: $item .= " {$key}='{$value}'"). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in MATCHA SNS 1.3.9 and earlier. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary script may be executed on the web browser of the user who accessed the website using the product. |
| The ActivityPub WordPress plugin before 8.0.2 does not properly filter posts to be displayed, allowed unauthenticated users to access drafts/scheduled/pending posts |
