Export limit exceeded: 378430 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (503 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13132 | 1 The Browser Company | 1 Dia | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| This vulnerability allowed a site to enter fullscreen, after a user click, without a full-screen notification (toast) appearing. Without this notification, users could potentially be misled about what site they were on if a malicious site renders a fake UI (like a fake address bar.) | ||||
| CVE-2025-64387 | 1 Circutor | 1 Tcprs1plus | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The web application is vulnerable to a so-called ‘clickjacking’ attack. In this type of attack, the vulnerable page is inserted into a page controlled by the attacker in order to deceive the victim. This deception can range from making the victim click on a button to making them enter their login credentials in a form that, a priori, appears legitimate. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9108 | 1 Portabilis | 1 I-diario | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Affected is an unknown function of the component Login Page. The manipulation leads to improper restriction of rendered ui layers. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24310 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames issue exists in HMI ViewJet C-more series, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to trick the product user to perform operations on the product's web pages. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3911 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can deceive users into performing unintended actions due to improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65922 | 1 Planka | 1 Planka | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| PLANKA 2.0.0 lacks X-Frame-Options and CSP frame-ancestors headers, allowing the application to be embedded within malicious iframes. While this does not lead to unintended modification of projects or tasks, it exposes users to Phishing attacks. Attackers can frame the legitimate Planka application on a malicious site to establish false trust (UI Redressing), potentially tricking users into entering sensitive information or credentials into overlaid fake forms. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because "PLANKA uses SameSite=Strict cookies, preventing authentication in cross-origin contexts. No session can be established. No credential interception or unauthorized actions are possible. Browser Same-Origin Policy prevents the parent page from accessing iframe content. Clickjacking is not applicable on the login page. Any credential capture would require attacker-controlled input and user interaction equivalent to phishing. The security outcome depends entirely on the user's trust in the parent page. An attacker can achieve the same effect with a fully fake login page. Embedding the legitimate page adds no risk, as browsers do not show URL, certificate, or padlock indicators in cross-origin iframes." | ||||
| CVE-2025-30191 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Ox App Suite | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Malicious content from E-Mail can be used to perform a redressing attack. Users can be tricked to perform unintended actions or provide sensitive information to a third party which would enable further threats. Attribute values containing HTML fragments are now denied by the sanitization procedure. No publicly available exploits are known | ||||
| CVE-2026-5905 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Incorrect security UI in Permissions in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-5906 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect security UI in Omnibox in Google Chrome on Android prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of the Omnibox (URL bar) via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-5875 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Policy bypass in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-5891 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-5897 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect security UI in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2024-40817 | 1 Apple | 2 Macos, Safari | 2026-04-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| The issue was addressed with improved UI handling. This issue is fixed in Safari 17.6, macOS Monterey 12.7.6, macOS Sonoma 14.6, macOS Ventura 13.6.8. Visiting a website that frames malicious content may lead to UI spoofing. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62328 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Nomad Server On Domino | 2026-03-20 | 3.7 Low |
| HCL Nomad server on Domino did not configure the frame-ancestors directive in the Content-Security-Policy header by default which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58405 | 1 Cgm | 2 Cgm Clininet, Clininet | 2026-03-09 | 6.1 Medium |
| The CGM CLININET application does not implement any mechanisms that prevent clickjacking attacks, neither HTTP security headers nor HTML-based frame‑busting protections were detected. As a result, an attacker can embed the application inside a maliciously crafted IFRAME and trick users into performing unintended actions, including potentially bypassing CSRF/XSRF defenses. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9397 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 9 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 6 more | 2026-03-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| A missing delay in directory upload UI could have made it possible for an attacker to trick a user into granting permission via clickjacking. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 131, Firefox ESR < 128.3, Thunderbird < 128.3, and Thunderbird < 131. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6557 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2026-02-26 | 5.4 Medium |
| Insufficient data validation in DevTools in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 138.0.7204.49 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2025-22417 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.3 High |
| In finishTransition of Transition.java, there is a possible way to bypass touch filtering restrictions due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22419 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.3 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to mislead the user into enabling malicious phone calls forwarding due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32349 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||