Export limit exceeded: 352051 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (352051 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-40094 | 1 Nimiq | 1 Core-rs-albatross | 2026-05-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| nimiq-blockchain provides persistent block storage for Nimiq's Rust implementation. In versions 1.3.0 and prior, network-libp2p discovery accepts signed PeerContact updates from untrusted peers and stores them in a peer contact book, eventually leading to address book crash. A PeerContact can legally contain an empty addresses list (no intrinsic validation enforces non-empty). Later, PeerContactBook::known_peers builds an address book by taking addresses.first().expect("every peer should have at least one address"). If the attacker has inserted a signed peer contact with addresses=[], any call to get_address_book (RPC/web client) can panic and crash the node/RPC task depending on panic settings. This issue has been fixed in version 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9141 | 1 Taiko | 1 Ag1000-01a Sms Alert Gateway | 2026-05-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Taiko AG1000-01A SMS Alert Gateway Rev 7.3 and Rev 8 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the embedded web configuration interface that allows unauthenticated attackers to access internal application pages without any session management or server-side authentication checks. Attackers with network access can directly request internal resources such as index.zhtml, point.zhtml, and log.shtml to gain full administrative read and write access, enabling unauthorized modification of alarm routing, device configuration, and disruption of monitoring and control functions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44076 | 1 Netatalk | 1 Netatalk | 2026-05-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Insufficient sanitization of volume paths in Netatalk 3.1.0 through 4.4.2 allows a local privileged user to inject OS commands and execute arbitrary code via a crafted volume path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35012 | 1 Openises | 1 Tickets | 2026-05-21 | 4.6 Medium |
| Open ISES Tickets before 3.44.2 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in add_facnote.php that allows authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript by passing an unsanitized value through the ticket_id GET parameter directly into a hidden input field VALUE attribute. Attackers can craft a malicious URL containing a JavaScript payload in the ticket_id parameter that executes in the victim's browser when the URL is visited. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7835 | 1 Netatalk | 1 Netatalk | 2026-05-21 | 3.1 Low |
| A format string argument mismatch in Netatalk 3.0.3 through 4.4.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to cause a minor denial of service via crafted input that triggers incorrect format string processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43496 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-21 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: sch_red: Replace direct dequeue call with peek and qdisc_dequeue_peeked When red qdisc has children (eg qfq qdisc) whose peek() callback is qdisc_peek_dequeued(), we could get a kernel panic. When the parent of such qdiscs (eg illustrated in patch #3 as tbf) wants to retrieve an skb from its child (red in this case), it will do the following: 1a. do a peek() - and when sensing there's an skb the child can offer, then - the child in this case(red) calls its child's (qfq) peek. qfq does the right thing and will return the gso_skb queue packet. Note: if there wasnt a gso_skb entry then qfq will store it there. 1b. invoke a dequeue() on the child (red). And herein lies the problem. - red will call the child's dequeue() which will essentially just try to grab something of qfq's queue. [ 78.667668][ T363] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000048-0x000000000000004f] [ 78.667927][ T363] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 363 Comm: ping Not tainted 7.1.0-rc1-00033-g46f74a3f7d57-dirty #790 PREEMPT(full) [ 78.668263][ T363] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 78.668486][ T363] RIP: 0010:qfq_dequeue+0x446/0xc90 [sch_qfq] [ 78.668718][ T363] Code: 54 c0 e8 dd 90 00 f1 48 c7 c7 e0 03 54 c0 48 89 de e8 ce 90 00 f1 48 8d 7b 48 b8 ff ff 37 00 48 89 fa 48 c1 e0 2a 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 74 05 e8 ef a1 e1 f1 48 8b 7b 48 48 8d 54 24 58 48 8d [ 78.669312][ T363] RSP: 0018:ffff88810de573e0 EFLAGS: 00010216 [ 78.669533][ T363] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 78.669790][ T363] RDX: 0000000000000009 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000048 [ 78.670044][ T363] RBP: ffff888110dc4000 R08: ffffffffb1b0885a R09: fffffbfff6ba9078 [ 78.670297][ T363] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff888110e31c80 R12: 0000001880000000 [ 78.670560][ T363] R13: ffff888110dc4150 R14: ffff888110dc42b8 R15: 0000000000000200 [ 78.670814][ T363] FS: 00007f66a8f09c40(0000) GS:ffff888163428000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 78.671110][ T363] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 78.671324][ T363] CR2: 000055db4c6a30a8 CR3: 000000010da67000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 [ 78.671585][ T363] PKRU: 55555554 [ 78.671713][ T363] Call Trace: [ 78.671843][ T363] <TASK> [ 78.671936][ T363] ? __pfx_qfq_dequeue+0x10/0x10 [sch_qfq] [ 78.672148][ T363] ? __pfx__printk+0x10/0x10 [ 78.672322][ T363] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 78.672496][ T363] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xa8/0x1a0 [ 78.672706][ T363] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 78.672875][ T363] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x19/0x1a0 [ 78.673047][ T363] red_dequeue+0x65/0x270 [sch_red] [ 78.673217][ T363] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 78.673385][ T363] tbf_dequeue.cold+0xb0/0x70c [sch_tbf] [ 78.673566][ T363] __qdisc_run+0x169/0x1900 The right thing to do in #1b is to grab the skb off gso_skb queue. This patchset fixes that issue by changing #1b to use qdisc_dequeue_peeked() method instead. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7836 | 1 Netatalk | 1 Netatalk | 2026-05-21 | 3.1 Low |
| An incorrect calculation in the hextoint macro in Netatalk 2.0.0 through 4.4.2 due to improper uppercase character handling allows a remote authenticated attacker to cause limited data modification via crafted hexadecimal input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9157 | 1 Gmission | 1 Web Fax | 2026-05-21 | 8.4 High |
| Improper input validation, Unrestricted upload of file with dangerous type vulnerability in Gmission Web Fax allows Remote Code Inclusion. This issue affects Web Fax: from 3.0 before 3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44057 | 1 Netatalk | 1 Netatalk | 2026-05-21 | 3.1 Low |
| A dead bounds check in the Spotlight RPC unmarshaller in Netatalk 3.0.0 through 4.4.2 results in an unreachable code path that provides no effective bounds protection, which may allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain limited information via crafted Spotlight RPC requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1543 | 2 Themefusion, Wordpress | 2 Fusion Builder, Wordpress | 2026-05-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Avada (Fusion) Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via multiple shortcodes in all versions up to, and including, 3.15.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user (typically an administrator) accesses a page displaying dynamic user data (such as via the Dynamic Data feature pulling user biographical information). | ||||
| CVE-2026-44071 | 1 Netatalk | 1 Netatalk | 2026-05-21 | 3.7 Low |
| Netatalk 3.1.2 through 4.4.2 is compiled without FORTIFY_SOURCE, which disables built-in buffer overflow detection at runtime, potentially allowing a remote attacker to cause a minor denial of service via memory errors that would otherwise be caught and safely terminated by runtime protection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5434 | 2026-05-21 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| Honeywell Control Network Module (CNM) contains insertion of sensitive information into an unintended directory. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability through probing system files, potentially resulting in unintended access to protected data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27349 | 2026-05-21 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in WPFunnels Team Mail Mint allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects Mail Mint: from n/a through 1.19.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42001 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Authoritative | 2026-05-21 | 7.5 High |
| Insufficient Validation of Autoprimary SOA Queries | ||||
| CVE-2026-41999 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Authoritative | 2026-05-21 | 4.8 Medium |
| Incorrect Behaviour of Views with TCP PROXY Requests | ||||
| CVE-2023-4669 | 1 Exagate | 2 Sysguard 3001, Sysguard 3001 Firmware | 2026-05-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Authentication Bypass by Assumed-Immutable Data vulnerability in Exagate SYSGuard 3001 allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects SYSGuard 3001: before 3.2.20.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67972 | 2 Fox-themes, Wordpress | 2 Prague, Wordpress | 2026-05-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Zoho Mail Zoho ZeptoMail allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Zoho ZeptoMail: from n/a through 3.2.9. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4674 | 1 Yaztekteknoloji | 1 E-commerce | 2026-05-21 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Yaztek Software Technologies and Computer Systems E-Commerce Software allows SQL Injection. This issue affects E-Commerce Software: through 20231229. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4670 | 1 Innosa Probbys Project | 1 Innosa Probbys | 2026-05-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Innosa Probbys allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Probbys: before 2. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4671 | 1 Talentyazilim | 1 Ecop | 2026-05-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Talent Software ECOP allows Command Line Execution through SQL Injection. This issue affects ECOP: before 32255. | ||||