Export limit exceeded: 347351 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (347351 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-41376 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-29 | 5.4 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains an allowlist bypass vulnerability in Matrix thread root and reply context handling that fails to properly validate message senders. Attackers can fetch thread-root and reply context messages that should be filtered by sender allowlists, bypassing access controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41382 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-29 | 5.4 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in Discord voice ingress that allows attackers to bypass channel and member allowlist restrictions. Attackers can exploit stale-role validation gaps and improper channel name validation to gain unauthorized access to restricted voice channels. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7361 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-29 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in iOS in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-41388 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-29 | 6.5 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a configuration management vulnerability where startup migration treats empty-array settings as missing values. Attackers can restart the application to rehydrate revoked Tlon configuration from file state, bypassing intended revocation controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7333 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-29 | 9.6 Critical |
| Use after free in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-40560 | 1 Miyagawa | 1 Starman | 2026-04-29 | 7.5 High |
| Starman versions before 0.4018 for Perl allows HTTP Request Smuggling via Improper Header Precedence. Starman incorrectly prioritizes "Content-Length" over "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" when both headers are present in an HTTP request. Per RFC 7230 3.3.3, Transfer-Encoding must take precedence. An attacker could exploit this to smuggle malicious HTTP requests via a front-end reverse proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22745 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-04-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks when resolving static resources. More precisely, an application can be vulnerable when all the following are true: * the application is using Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux * the application is serving static resources from the file system * the application is running on a Windows platform When all the conditions above are met, the attacker can send malicious requests that are slow to resolve and that can keep HTTP connections in use. This can cause a Denial of Service on the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42248 | 1 Ollama | 1 Ollama | 2026-04-29 | N/A |
| Ollama for Windows does not perform integrity or authenticity verification of downloaded update executables. Unlike other platforms, the Windows implementation of the update verification routine unconditionally returns success so no digital signature or trust validation is performed before staging or executing update payloads, enabling attacker‑supplied executables to be accepted and later executed by the application. Critically, Ollama for Windows performs silent automatic updates, so the malicious payload may be installed automatically without user awareness. Maintainers of this project were notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Versions from 0.12.10 to 0.17.5 were tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested but might also be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68121 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Crypto Tls, Go | 2026-04-29 | 9.1 Critical |
| During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and mutates the returned Config, or uses Config.GetConfigForClient. This can cause a client to resume a session with a server that it would not have resumed with during the initial handshake, or cause a server to resume a session with a client that it would not have resumed with during the initial handshake. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0861 | 1 Gnu | 1 Glibc | 2026-04-29 | 8.4 High |
| Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions (memalign, posix_memalign, aligned_alloc) in the GNU C Library version 2.30 to 2.42 may result in an integer overflow, which could consequently result in a heap corruption. Note that the attacker must have control over both, the size as well as the alignment arguments of the memalign function to be able to exploit this. The size parameter must be close enough to PTRDIFF_MAX so as to overflow size_t along with the large alignment argument. This limits the malicious inputs for the alignment for memalign to the range [1<<62+ 1, 1<<63] and exactly 1<<63 for posix_memalign and aligned_alloc. Typically the alignment argument passed to such functions is a known constrained quantity (e.g. page size, block size, struct sizes) and is not attacker controlled, because of which this may not be easily exploitable in practice. An application bug could potentially result in the input alignment being too large, e.g. due to a different buffer overflow or integer overflow in the application or its dependent libraries, but that is again an uncommon usage pattern given typical sources of alignments. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41395 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-29 | 7.5 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains a webhook replay vulnerability in Plivo V3 signature verification that canonicalizes query ordering for signatures but hashes raw URLs for replay detection. Attackers can reorder query parameters to bypass replay cache detection and trigger duplicate voice-call processing with a captured valid signed webhook. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7360 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-29 | 3.1 Low |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input. in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-5760 | 1 Sglang | 1 Sglang | 2026-04-29 | 9.8 Critical |
| SGLang's reranking endpoint (/v1/rerank) achieves Remote Code Execution (RCE) when a model file containing a malcious tokenizer.chat_template is loaded, as the Jinja2 chat templates are rendered using an unsandboxed jinja2.Environment(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-7353 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-29 | 8.3 High |
| Heap buffer overflow in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-7351 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-29 | 3.1 Low |
| Race in MHTML in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to leak cross-origin data via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-7349 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-29 | 7.5 High |
| Use after free in Cast in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed an attacker on the local network segment to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via malicious network traffic. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-41402 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-29 | 4.2 Medium |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.31 contains a scope bypass vulnerability in webhook replay cache deduplication that allows authenticated attackers to replay messages across sibling targets using the same messageId. Attackers can exploit overly broad cache keying to bypass replay protection and deliver duplicate webhook messages to unintended targets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7355 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-29 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Media in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-7350 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-29 | 8.3 High |
| Use after free in WebMIDI in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-7345 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-04-29 | 8.3 High |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Feedback in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.138 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||