Export limit exceeded: 396738 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 396738 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 396738 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (396738 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-80218 | 1 Team-alembic | 1 Ash Authentication | 2026-09-17 | N/A |
| Improper Authentication vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows an attacker holding a sign-in token for one authenticated resource to be signed in as a user of a different resource. AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.SignInWithTokenPreparation.extract_primary_keys_from_subject/2 parses the JWT sub claim (for example user?id=1) with URI.parse/1 and keeps only its query string, discarding the path segment that names the subject the token was issued for. Nothing else restores that binding: AshAuthentication.Jwt.verify/3 checks the signature, exp, nbf, jti and the library-version claims, the purpose check only requires sign_in, and the remaining comparison is over primary-key field names, which are identical across resources. The WebAuthn sign-in and remember-me preparations carry copies of the same helper and drop the path in the same way. The magic link sign-in path pins the subject name against the resource and is not affected. This issue affects ash_authentication: from 3.10.5 before 4.15.0 and from 5.0.0-rc.0 before 5.0.0-rc.14. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79699 | 1 Redhat | 7 Ansible Automation Platform, Container Native Virtualization, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2026-09-17 | 4.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the containers/storage library. A crafted tar archive containing a malicious whiteout header (e.g. victim/.wh.) can cause the extraction destination directory to be replaced with an arbitrary file when processed by storage/pkg/archive.UnpackLayer, ApplyLayer, or ApplyUncompressedLayer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78301 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-09-17 | 5.8 Medium |
| A malformed zone may contain an NS or DNAME node above its origin, which `named` treats as a zone cut. If an attacker inserts a malformed zone into a BIND authoritative server (e.g., via zone transfer), queries for names inside the configured zone then lose authoritative status and return an out-of-zone delegation. On a server that also provides recursion BIND can follow this locally sourced cut and cache attacker-supplied data, affecting names outside the configured zone. This situation persists as long as the malformed zone remains in the zone database. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78223 | 1 Team-alembic | 1 Ash Authentication | 2026-09-17 | N/A |
| Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows a caller of the token revocation action to neutralise a revocation or write arbitrary rows into the token resource. AshAuthentication.TokenResource.RevokeTokenChange.change/3 reads the :token argument and decodes it with AshAuthentication.Jwt.peek/1, which delegates to Joken.peek_claims/1 and performs no signature check, unlike Jwt.verify/4. The jti, exp and sub claims it returns are written straight onto the revocation record, guarded only by byte_size(token) > 0. Because expires_at derives from the attacker-chosen exp, a forged copy of a genuine token that keeps the real jti but backdates exp yields a revocation row that is already expired: expunge_expired removes it and the genuine token passes revoked? again. Arbitrary jti and sub values can be inserted the same way. This issue affects ash_authentication: from 0.2.0 before 4.15.0 and from 5.0.0-rc.0 before 5.0.0-rc.14. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77692 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| An attacker can cause `named` to abort by sending a crafted DNS-over-HTTPS request with a cryptographically invalid SIG(0) record, and then closing the transport connection prematurely. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77119 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-09-17 | 5.9 Medium |
| A validly signed NSEC3 from an unrelated sibling zone may be accepted as an insecurity proof, downgrading a secure delegation and letting a forged unsigned answer through. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75029 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-09-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| In a query response, an attacker may send `named` multiple copies of a record that should only exist once (such as an SOA record). If the RDATA is the same on all the copies, the record is appended to the in-memory RDATA set, which can cause increased memory usage of the negative cache and possibly lead to other memory attack vectors. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19941 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-09-17 | 5.9 Medium |
| An inapplicable NSEC record may be accepted by a `named` resolver as proof that no wildcard exists, which could allow an attacker at the same or an upstream level of the zone name to mask the existence of a victim's wildcard record. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19668 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-09-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| A BIND recursive resolver may experience excessive resource consumption if it encounters large numbers of a particular kind of invalid DNSSEC record. Default limits on "max-records-per-type" and "max-types-per-name" help mitigate the exposure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19667 | 1 Isc | 2 Bind, Bind 9 | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| If an attacker-controlled authoritative server can produce a negative answer that is exactly 65536 bytes, then a flaw in `named` results in a negative cache entry of 0 bytes. When this entry is subsequently read, `named` aborts. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19662 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-09-17 | 5.9 Medium |
| An attacker may be able to cause a `named` resolver to abort. The attack requires inducing the victim resolver to send multiple queries for a DNSSEC-signed zone hosted by an authoritative server under the control of the attacker. If the auth responds with a particular sequence of crafted answers, and those answers arrive in a particular order with particular timing, the `named` resolver will encounter a use-after-free bug, and abort. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14850 | 1 Mobiapparc | 1 Mobiapparc | 2026-09-17 | N/A |
| The password reset funcionality is vulnerable to unauthorized account modification due to improper validation of the user_id parameter. An attacker can manipulate this predictable numeric identifier to reset passwords for arbitrary users without proving account ownership. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72963 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 18 more | 2026-09-17 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Windows Modern Execution Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72980 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 18 more | 2026-09-17 | 4.4 Medium |
| Uncontrolled search path element in Windows Hello allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72966 | 1 Microsoft | 25 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 22 more | 2026-09-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Missing authorization in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69607 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2012 and 11 more | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| Use after free in Windows Deployment Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72999 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 18 more | 2026-09-17 | 6.8 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows USB Hub Driver allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69609 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-09-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87647 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-17 | 3.4 Low |
| Uninitialized resource in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-87576 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-09-17 | 3.4 Low |
| Uninitialized resource in GPU in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||