Export limit exceeded: 363426 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (363426 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-8921 | 1 Asus | 1 Asus Business Manager | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| External Control of File Name or Path vulnerability in ASUS Business Manager allows a local user to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges via a tampered IPC message. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS Business Manager ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4990 | 1 Asus | 1 Ai Suite 3 | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in the ASUS AI Suite 3 driver allows a local user to bypass security validation and access restricted memory blocks via crafted IOCTL requests, leading to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4989 | 1 Asus | 1 Ai Suite 3 | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in the ASUS AI Suite 3 driver allows a local user to access unintended memory regions via crafted IOCTL requests, leading to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4967 | 2026-07-06 | 7.5 High | ||
| In IMS, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12064 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| When a user invokes curl using a schemeless URL combined with `--proto-default` sftp (or scp), a disconnect occurs between the tool layer and libcurl. The tool layer incorrectly infers the URL scheme, which erroneously bypasses the initialization of critical SSH security options like CURLOPT_SSH_HOST_PUBLIC_KEY_SHA256 and CURLOPT_SSH_KNOWNHOSTS. Conversely, the libcurl runtime successfully honors CURLOPT_DEFAULT_PROTOCOL and establishes the connection via SFTP/SCP as specified. Because the tool layer skipped the security configuration, these SSH host verification options are silently omitted, causing curl to connect to an unverified SSH remote host without throwing an error. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8458 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| libcurl might in some circumstances reuse the wrong connection when asked to do Negotiate-authenticated ones, even when they are set to use different 'services'. libcurl features a pool of recent connections so that subsequent requests can reuse an existing connection to avoid overhead. When reusing a connection a range of criteria must be met. Due to a logical error in the code, a request that was issued by an application could wrongfully reuse an existing connection to the same server that was authenticated using different services. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8926 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| When asking curl to use a `.netrc` file to find credentials and at the same time specifying a URL with a username(without a password), like `https://user@example.com/`, curl could wrongly get and use the password for *another* user set in the `.netrc` file for that host if such a one exists and there is no match for the specified user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8932 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| libcurl would reuse a previously created connection even when some mTLS config related option had been changed that should have prohibited reuse. libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequent transfers to reuse if one of them matches the setup. However, some TLS settings related to client certificates were left out from the configuration match checks, making them match too easily. In particular options related to the private key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9545 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| In this scenario, libcurl first uses a proper HTTP/3 server for the initial transfers, and when it makes a second transfer to the same site it has been replaced by the attacker's impostor machine - without a valid certificate. When libcurl returns to the hostname the second time with a cached SSL session (`CURLOPT_SSL_SESSIONID_CACHE` is not disabled) and early data enabled (the `CURLSSLOPT_EARLYDATA` bit is set in `CURLOPT_SSL_OPTIONS`), libcurl might send off the second request's bytes on that new connection *before* enforcing the certificate verification failure. Potentially leaking sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10055 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Theia | 2026-07-06 | 8.5 High |
| In Eclipse Theia since version 1.26.0, the backend /services/request-service RPC accepts an attacker-controlled URL from any client connected to the standard /services messaging endpoint, performs the HTTP request server-side, and returns the full response body to the caller. Because the destination URL is neither validated nor allowlisted, a remote attacker with access to the Theia service connection can issue server-side HTTP requests to localhost or other backend-reachable hosts and read their responses, exposing internal administrative endpoints, cloud instance metadata services, and other resources that are intentionally outside the browser network boundary. The vulnerability affects deployments where the Theia service connection is reachable by untrusted users (for example, multi-tenant or publicly-reachable Theia deployments). | ||||
| CVE-2026-41123 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper access control vulnerability in the RBAC. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26355 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper neutralization of special Elements used in an OS command ('OS command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46466 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-06 | 2.7 Low |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an use of less trusted source vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46465 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-06 | 5.5 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46464 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-06 | 4.9 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper link resolution before file access ('Link following') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46463 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-07-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14786 | 1 Radareorg | 1 Radare2 | 2026-07-06 | 3.3 Low |
| A security flaw has been discovered in radareorg radare2 up to 6.1.6. This impacts the function r_str_word_get0set of the file libr/util/str.c. The manipulation results in integer overflow. The attack must be initiated from a local position. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The patch is identified as 11ac224c0eb8d57830fccc99e1c1cd8e5d958813. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45489 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-07-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2026-54424 | 1 Unity | 1 Parsec | 2026-07-06 | 8.4 High |
| An Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs vulnerability in Unity Parsec on Windows hosts leads to a potential Elevation of Privilege. This issue affects Parsec through v2026-05-04.0. The patched version is Parsec for Windows version 150-104a. A user can generate a situation where there is an instance of parsecd.exe running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM with a user-controlled value of the AppData environment variable. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12195 | 2026-07-06 | N/A | ||
| myVesta is affected by an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability. Low privileged users can insert arbitrary commands as a part of the v_ftp_user parameter when deleting FTP usernames. This could result in the execution of commands as the admin user or takevoer of the admin user in myVesta. | ||||