Export limit exceeded: 382363 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 24865 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24865 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-51391 | 1 Silabs | 1 Gecko Software Development Kit | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A bug in Micrium OS Network HTTP Server permits an invalid pointer dereference during header processing - potentially allowing a device crash and Denial of Service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50956 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A buffer overflow in the RecvSocketData function of Inovance HCPLC_AM401-CPU1608TPTN 21.38.0.0, HCPLC_AM402-CPU1608TPTN 41.38.0.0, and HCPLC_AM403-CPU1608TN 81.38.0.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted Modbus message. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29943 | 1 Amd | 6 Epyc, Epyc 8004, Epyc 9004 and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 3.2 Low |
| Write what were condition within AMD CPUs may allow an admin-privileged attacker to modify the configuration of the CPU pipeline potentially resulting in the corruption of the stack pointer inside an SEV-SNP guest. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29948 | 1 Amd | 2 Epyc 9005 Series Processors, Epyc Embedded 9005 Series Processors | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper access control in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to bypass RMP protections, potentially resulting in a loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55118 | 1 Bmc | 1 Control-m/agent | 2026-04-15 | 8.9 High |
| Memory corruptions can be remotely triggered in the Control-M/Agent when SSL/TLS communication is configured. The issue occurs in the following cases: * Control-M/Agent 9.0.20: SSL/TLS configuration is set to the non-default setting "use_openssl=n"; * Control-M/Agent 9.0.21 and 9.0.22: Agent router configuration uses the non-default settings "JAVA_AR=N" and "use_openssl=n" | ||||
| CVE-2024-34020 | 1 Hcode | 1 Hcode | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A stack-based buffer overflow was found in the putSDN() function of mail.c in hcode through 2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29951 | 1 Amd | 4 Ryzen 5000 Series Mobile Processors With Radeon Graphics, Ryzen Embedded R1000 Series Processors, Ryzen Embedded R2000 Series Processors and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A buffer overflow in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) bootloader could allow an attacker to overwrite memory, potentially resulting in privilege escalation and arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61128 | 1 Wavlink | 3 M30hg3 V240730, Quantum D3g, Wl-wn530hg3 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in WAVLINK QUANTUM D3G/WL-WN530HG3 firmware M30HG3_V240730, and possibly other wavlink models allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted referrer value POST to login.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6768 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2016 and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Denial of Service in CLFS.sys in Microsoft Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, and Windows Server 2022 allows a malicious authenticated low-privilege user to cause a Blue Screen of Death via a forced call to the KeBugCheckEx function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49604 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| For Realtek AmebaD devices, a heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in Ameba-AIoT ameba-arduino-d before version 3.1.9 and ameba-rtos-d before commit c2bfd8216a1cbc19ad2ab5f48f372ecea756d67a on 2025/07/03. In the WLAN driver defragment function, lack of validation of the size of fragmented Wi-Fi frames may lead to a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23594 | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| A buffer overflow vulnerability was reported in a system recovery bootloader that was part of the Lenovo preloaded Windows 7 and 8 operating systems from 2012 to 2014 that could allow a privileged attacker with local access to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10158 | 1 Rsync | 1 Rsync | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A malicious client acting as the receiver of an rsync file transfer can trigger an out of bounds read of a heap based buffer, via a negative array index. The malicious rsync client requires at least read access to the remote rsync module in order to trigger the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15080 | 2 Mitsubishi, Mitsubishi Electric | 2 Melsec Iq-r Series, Melsec Iq-r Series | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R Series R08PCPU, R16PCPU, R32PCPU, and R120PCPU allows an unauthenticated attacker to read device data or part of a control program from the affected product, write device data in the affected product, or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on the affected product by sending a specially crafted packet containing a specific command to the affected product. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20766 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ata 190 Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol functionality of Cisco ATA 190 Series Adaptive Telephone Adapter firmware could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to an out-of-bounds read when processing Cisco Discovery Protocol packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted Cisco Discovery Protocol packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a service restart.Cisco has released firmware updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29779 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Post-Quantum Secure Feldman's Verifiable Secret Sharing provides a Python implementation of Feldman's Verifiable Secret Sharing (VSS) scheme. In versions 0.8.0b2 and prior, the `secure_redundant_execution` function in feldman_vss.py attempts to mitigate fault injection attacks by executing a function multiple times and comparing results. However, several critical weaknesses exist. Python's execution environment cannot guarantee true isolation between redundant executions, the constant-time comparison implementation in Python is subject to timing variations, the randomized execution order and timing provide insufficient protection against sophisticated fault attacks, and the error handling may leak timing information about partial execution results. These limitations make the protection ineffective against targeted fault injection attacks, especially from attackers with physical access to the hardware. A successful fault injection attack could allow an attacker to bypass the redundancy check mechanisms, extract secret polynomial coefficients during share generation or verification, force the acceptance of invalid shares during verification, and/or manipulate the commitment verification process to accept fraudulent commitments. This undermines the core security guarantees of the Verifiable Secret Sharing scheme. As of time of publication, no patched versions of Post-Quantum Secure Feldman's Verifiable Secret Sharing exist, but other mitigations are available. Long-term remediation requires reimplementing the security-critical functions in a lower-level language like Rust. Short-term mitigations include deploying the software in environments with physical security controls, increasing the redundancy count (from 5 to a higher number) by modifying the source code, adding external verification of cryptographic operations when possible, considering using hardware security modules (HSMs) for key operations. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14310 | 1 Rethinkdb | 1 Rethinkdb | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in rethinkdb.This issue affects rethinkdb: before 2.4.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10385 | 1 Mercury | 1 Km08-708h Giga Wifi Wave2 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in Mercury KM08-708H GiGA WiFi Wave2 1.1. Affected by this issue is the function sub_450B2C of the file /goform/mcr_setSysAdm. The manipulation of the argument ChgUserId leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24812 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1BE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/DC (6ES7211-1AE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1HE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1BE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1BG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1BG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1217C DC/DC/DC (6ES7217-1AG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2212-1AE40-1XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2214-1AG40-1XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AF40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HF40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AF40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7). Affected devices do not process correctly certain special crafted packets sent to port 102/tcp, which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service in the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24328 | 2026-04-15 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| Sending a crafted SOAP "set" operation message within the Mobile Network Operator (MNO) internal Radio Access Network (RAN) management network can cause Nokia Single RAN baseband OAM service component restart with software versions earlier than release 24R1-SR 1.0 MP. This issue has been corrected to release 24R1-SR 1.0 MP and later. The OAM service component restarts automatically after the stack overflow without causing a base station restart or network service degradation, and without leaving any permanent impact on the Nokia Single RAN baseband OAM service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25253 | 1 Iobit | 1 Driver Booster | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Driver Booster v10.6 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the Host parameter under the Customize proxy module. | ||||