Export limit exceeded: 377274 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 377274 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 377274 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (377274 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-72629 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized cross-space access via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). The result is disclosure of inference output from a trained model in a different space that the user is not authorized to list, read, or use, which exposes the behavior of a model. The same pattern also reached the deployment stop and deployment update operations, allowing an active trained model deployment in another space to be stopped or to have its allocated resources altered. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49096 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Uncaught Exception (CWE-248) in Kibana Cases can lead to denial of service via Input Data Manipulation (CAPEC-153). Malformed link syntax stored in a case comment was not rejected or sanitized when the comment was later formatted for display, and the resulting unhandled error prevented the affected case from being displayed. An authenticated user holding privileges to comment on a case could store such a comment, after which that case became inaccessible to every user who opened it until the stored comment was removed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49089 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A query expression accepted by a connector reporting operation was processed without any limit on its size, and an oversized expression caused the Kibana process to spend an unbounded amount of time evaluating it. An authenticated user with read-only privileges was able to send a single request that left Kibana unable to serve any user until the process was restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19487 | 1 Perl | 1 Perl | 2026-08-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.41.9 produce incorrect regular expression match results when a stale failure flag ends the Aho-Corasick prescan early in S_find_byclass. The prescan walks the subject for positions where the full pattern could match, and the engine tries it from the leftmost one recorded. A failing transition sets the failed flag, and a later successful transition does not clear it, so the prescan reads the stale flag as a failure and stops before it can record a candidate that starts earlier. It takes a subject where one candidate is recorded and a later character then forces a fallback through a fail link that succeeds. Example: "ABCDE" =~ m/ABCF|BCDE|C/; # matches C at offset 2, not BCDE "ABCDE" =~ m/ABCF|BCDE|C(G)/; # no match, BCDE missed An alternation like this can miss input it should match, or match it on the wrong branch, so an access or filtering decision made from the result can be wrong. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59326 | 1 Cpsd | 1 Cryptopro Secure Disk | 2026-08-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to enforce IMA policy protections across temporary file systems, allowing for unsigned code to be executed from these locations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72664 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized execution of Elastic Defend response actions on managed hosts via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A Kibana user who holds only detection rule authoring privileges for the Elastic Security solution can associate automated endpoint response actions with a detection rule, even though the dedicated Endpoint response action privileges that govern those capabilities (host isolation, process operations, and execute operations) have not been granted to that user. When such a rule generates alerts, the associated response actions are carried out against the matching hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72665 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 8.1 High |
| Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized execution of Osquery and Elastic Defend response actions on managed hosts via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A Kibana user who is able to author and evaluate Elastic Security detection rules can cause response actions to be carried out against enrolled agents without holding the Osquery live query privileges or the Elastic Defend response action privileges that normally govern those capabilities. Depending on the response action involved, this can result in disclosure of information from the affected hosts or in unauthorized changes to their state. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72666 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 6.8 Medium |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized query execution against Elastic Agents that are assigned to a Kibana space the requesting user has no access to, via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A user who is authorized to run Osquery live queries in one space can have a query carried out on hosts belonging to another space, resulting in disclosure of information from those hosts to the Osquery results data stream. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66697 | 2 Colissimo, Wordpress | 2 Colissimo Officiel : Méthodes De Livraison Pour Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Colissimo Officiel : Méthodes de livraison pour WooCommerce <= 2.10.0 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56657 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-13 | 6.2 Medium |
| Gitea SSH Key Parser Denial of Service | ||||
| CVE-2026-59714 | 1 Open-webui | 1 Open-webui | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.5 before 0.10.0, any authenticated user can overwrite the content of a message in a channel they do not belong to (including private and DM channels) by sending a chat completion request with a channel:-prefixed chat_id and a target message_id. The channel: path routes pipeline output through _make_channel_emitter, which writes to the Messages table using the caller-supplied message_id without binding it to the channel. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19483 | 1 Ibm | 1 Storage Scale | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| IBM Storage Scale 5.2.3.0 through 5.2.3.8, and 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.1.0 Secrets may be disclosed in log files in IBM Storage Scale Management GUI The admin password is logged into the GUI log of IBM Storage Scale Systems Deploy and Upgrade from GUI. Secrets may be disclosed in information related to exceptions in IBM Storage Scale Management GUI. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19297 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-08-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 could allow a remote attacker to obtain unauthorized access to user accounts due to improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18715 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper processing of XML external entities. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18671 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to force a NetServer server thread exception, caused by an integer overflow during bounds checking in request processing. The attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a temporary denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19749 | 1 Tenda | 10 Ch10, Ch7, Ch7g and 7 more | 2026-08-13 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was detected in Tenda CH7, CH7G, CH10, CP3, CP3 Pro, CP7, TC3B14C, TC3B15C, TC3T14C and TC3T15C up to 20260625. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component RTSP/ONVIF. Performing a manipulation results in missing authentication. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58427 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-13 | N/A |
| Private org member list leaked via /members API endpoint — incomplete fix for PR #38145 | ||||
| CVE-2026-73569 | 1 Naturalintelligence | 1 Fast-xml-parser | 2026-08-13 | N/A |
| fast-xml-parser allows users to process XML from JS object without C/C++ based libraries or callbacks. From 5.9.3 until 5.10.1, src/xmlparser/OrderedObjParser.js processes multiple DOCTYPE declarations within a single XML document and passes each declaration's entities through addInputEntities(). addInputEntities() resets maxTotalExpansions and maxExpandedLength every time it is called, allowing additional DOCTYPE declarations to repeatedly reset the configured entity-expansion limits during one parse operation. A crafted XML document can then cause excessive CPU use, event-loop blocking, memory exhaustion, and process termination. This issue is fixed in version 5.10.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73530 | 1 Flytohub | 1 Flyto-core | 2026-08-13 | 7.7 High |
| Flyto2 Core before 2.28.0 contains a server-side request forgery guard bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to reach internal services by supplying URLs using the unblocked IPv6 address `::` which the kernel routes to loopback identically to `0.0.0.0`. Attackers can submit requests or trigger 302 redirects to ` to bypass the private IP range and blocked hostname checks in `is_private_ip()`, reaching services bound to IPv6 loopback across the `http.get`, `http.request`, and `http.batch` modules. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72642 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-08-13 | 8.8 High |
| The native inference process that Elasticsearch uses to evaluate uploaded machine learning models accepts a model operation that computes a memory address from an offset supplied inside the model, without validating that the offset stays within the bounds of the underlying storage. A user with the privileges required to upload and deploy a trained model can craft a model that reads and writes memory outside the intended allocation. The result is heap corruption that crashes the inference process, and, with sufficient control over the heap layout, could allow arbitrary code execution in the context of that process. | ||||