Export limit exceeded: 369578 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 369578 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 369578 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 369578 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 369578 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 369578 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 369578 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (369578 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-52199 | 2026-07-22 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| An issue in Generic OEM UZ801_v2.1 4G LTE Router V3.4.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the sbin/adbd component | ||||
| CVE-2025-51678 | 2026-07-22 | 7.5 High | ||
| An issue was discovered in RISC-V PicoRV32 commit 87c89a. A mismatch in the PCPI INSN and memory address can lead to unexpected behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2026-36669 | 1 Fengoffice | 1 Feng Office | 2026-07-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| An unauthenticated arbitrary file upload vulnerability in ck_upload_handler.php in Feng Office 3.11.13.11 allows remote attackers to upload malicious files (such as .html) to the web-accessible /tmp/ directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51081 | 2026-07-22 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) 9.x 5.1.8 and Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) 8.x 4.3.16 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via injecting a crafted payload. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51082 | 2026-07-22 | 7.2 High | ||
| A race condition between the vncproxy and vncwebsocket API calls in Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) 9.x pve-manager before 9.1.9 and 8.x before 8.4.19; qemu-server 9.x before 9.1.7 and 8.x before 8.4.7; and pve-container before 6.1.3 (PVE 9.x) and before 5.3.4 (PVE 8.x) allows an attacker with privileges to call "vncproxy" to hijack a VNC session that is established in parallel by a different user for a different VM. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51083 | 2026-07-22 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Incorrect access control in Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) 9.x qemu-server before 9.1.8 and 8.x before 8.4.8 allows users within limited privileges to obtain hashed passwords via the cloudinit/dump API. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63969 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-22 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: fix possible infinite loop in rt6_fill_node() Sashiko reported this issue [1]. Apply the same fix as commit f8d8ce1b515a ("ipv6: fix possible infinite loop in fib6_info_uses_dev()"). Writers holding tb6_lock can list_del_rcu(&rt->fib6_siblings) without waiting for RCU readers; rt->fib6_siblings.next then still points into the old ring and this softirq-side walker never reaches &rt->fib6_siblings, causing a CPU stall. fib6_del_route() always WRITE_ONCE()s rt->fib6_nsiblings to 0 before list_del_rcu(), so an inside-loop check is a reliable detach signal. [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260526020227.4857-1-jiayuan.chen%40linux.dev | ||||
| CVE-2026-60060 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | ||
| Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency (CWE-130) vulnerability exists in TTSSH2 plugin of Tera Term provided by TeraTerm Project. When Tera Term attempts to establish an SSH connection to a server set up by an attacker, out-of-bounds read/write may occur. As a result, the contents of adjacent memory regions may be transmitted to the server, and Tera Term may behave unexpected or terminate abnormally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58317 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | ||
| Unsigned to Signed Conversion Error (CWE-196) vulnerability exists in TTSSH2 plugin of Tera Term provided by TeraTerm Project. When Tera Term attempts to establish an SSH connection to a server set up by an attacker, out-of-bounds read/write may occur. As a result, the contents of adjacent memory regions may be transmitted to the server, and Tera Term may behave unexpected or terminate abnormally. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25764 | 1 Asus | 1 Aura Sync | 2026-07-22 | N/A |
| **UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED** Exposed IOCTL with Insufficient Access Control in the ASUS AURA SYNC driver allows a local user to bypass the driver's verification and invoke arbitrary IOCTLs, resulting in privilege escalation. Refer to the 'End-of-Life Notice and Driver Update for Legacy ASUS Drivers ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15379 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | ||
| The Altiris WMI provider exposes a class (AltirisAgent_Stream) that allows any local standard user to read the contents of any file accessible to the SYSTEM account, bypassing filesystem ACLs. No admin privileges required. The provider reverts to the LocalSystem context when servicing WMI queries without re-impersonating the caller. Any local standard user can therefore read SYSTEM-readable files — including configuration files, service logs, and secrets stored with SYSTEM/Administrator-only ACLs — by querying the provider directly. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15380 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | ||
| A non-administrator interactive user can obtain full SYSTEM code execution through a DCOM/task scheduler logic chain — no network access, no memory corruption required (ITMS 8.7.3) | ||||
| CVE-2024-23564 | 2026-07-22 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| HCL Aftermarket EPC is affected by Business Logic Vulnerability using which a non valid user of the application can obtain passwords from the server and redirect them to their own email address by manipulating the server's response. The application includes checks in the initial requests to verify the validity of the provided UserId, but similar validation is not applied to Email requests when sending passwords to user emails. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23566 | 2026-07-22 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to brute force attacks since application doesn’t have captcha implemented. It can lead to various security issues like brute force , automated attacks & account enumeration | ||||
| CVE-2024-23573 | 2026-07-22 | 3.7 Low | ||
| HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the Application is vulnerable to Lucky 13. that makes the SS LLUCKY13 possible affects the TLS1.1and 1.2 and DTLS1.0 or 1.2 implementations . It also affects previous versions such as SSL3.0 and TLS1.0. This can also be considered a type of man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23574 | 2026-07-22 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since It was found that a malicious actor can use brute-force techniques to either guess or confirm valid users in the system. Use renumeration is when a malicious actor can use brute-force techniques to either guess or confirm valid users in a system | ||||
| CVE-2024-23569 | 2026-07-22 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack since the server is not configured with “X-XSS-Protection" header | ||||
| CVE-2024-23578 | 2026-07-22 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack as the application implements an HTML5 cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) policy for this request that allows access from any domain (*-Wildcard). | ||||
| CVE-2024-23572 | 2026-07-22 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to attack as cookie appears to contain a session token, which may increase the risk associated with this issue. You should review the contents of the cookie to determine its function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16108 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-07-22 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the default-groups REST endpoint and realm representation of Keycloak. This component is responsible for managing groups that are automatically assigned to new users within a realm. The issue allows a delegated administrator with realm-viewing permissions to see the names and identifiers of hidden default groups, even if they lack the specific permissions to view those groups. This can lead to the exposure of sensitive organizational structures or internal group names. | ||||