Export limit exceeded: 382570 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (382570 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-24122 | 4 Apache, Debian, Oracle and 1 more | 6 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Agile Product Lifecycle Management and 3 more | 2026-08-25 | 5.9 Medium |
| When serving resources from a network location using the NTFS file system, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.39, 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.106 were susceptible to JSP source code disclosure in some configurations. The root cause was the unexpected behaviour of the JRE API File.getCanonicalPath() which in turn was caused by the inconsistent behaviour of the Windows API (FindFirstFileW) in some circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25122 | 4 Apache, Debian, Oracle and 1 more | 15 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Agile Product Lifecycle Management and 12 more | 2026-08-25 | 7.5 High |
| When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25329 | 4 Apache, Debian, Oracle and 1 more | 15 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Agile Product Lifecycle Management and 12 more | 2026-08-25 | 7.0 High |
| The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33037 | 5 Apache, Debian, Mcafee and 2 more | 25 Tomcat, Tomee, Debian Linux and 22 more | 2026-08-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3572 | 3 Oracle, Pypa, Redhat | 6 Agile Product Lifecycle Management, Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native Environment, Communications Cloud Native Core Policy and 3 more | 2026-08-25 | 5.7 Medium |
| A flaw was found in python-pip in the way it handled Unicode separators in git references. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to install a different revision on a repository. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. This is fixed in python-pip version 21.1. | ||||
| CVE-2021-36373 | 3 Apache, Oracle, Redhat | 33 Ant, Agile Product Lifecycle Management, Banking Trade Finance and 30 more | 2026-08-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| When reading a specially crafted TAR archive an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-41182 | 8 Debian, Drupal, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 38 Debian Linux, Drupal, Fedora and 35 more | 2026-08-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of the `altField` option of the Datepicker widget from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. Any string value passed to the `altField` option is now treated as a CSS selector. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `altField` option from untrusted sources. | ||||
| CVE-2021-41183 | 8 Debian, Drupal, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 37 Debian Linux, Drupal, Fedora and 34 more | 2026-08-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of various `*Text` options of the Datepicker widget from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. The values passed to various `*Text` options are now always treated as pure text, not HTML. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `*Text` options from untrusted sources. | ||||
| CVE-2021-41184 | 7 Drupal, Fedoraproject, Jqueryui and 4 more | 36 Drupal, Fedora, Jquery Ui and 33 more | 2026-08-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| jQuery-UI is the official jQuery user interface library. Prior to version 1.13.0, accepting the value of the `of` option of the `.position()` util from untrusted sources may execute untrusted code. The issue is fixed in jQuery UI 1.13.0. Any string value passed to the `of` option is now treated as a CSS selector. A workaround is to not accept the value of the `of` option from untrusted sources. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45105 | 6 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 3 more | 131 Log4j, Debian Linux, Cloud Manager and 128 more | 2026-08-25 | 5.9 Medium |
| Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21467 | 1 Oracle | 1 Agile Product Lifecycle Management | 2026-08-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Attachments). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile PLM. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile PLM accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2022-23437 | 4 Apache, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 31 Xerces-j, Active Iq Unified Manager, Agile Engineering Data Management and 28 more | 2026-08-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| There's a vulnerability within the Apache Xerces Java (XercesJ) XML parser when handling specially crafted XML document payloads. This causes, the XercesJ XML parser to wait in an infinite loop, which may sometimes consume system resources for prolonged duration. This vulnerability is present within XercesJ version 2.12.1 and the previous versions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22039 | 1 Oracle | 1 Agile Product Lifecycle Management | 2026-08-25 | 5.4 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: WebClient). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile PLM. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Agile PLM, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Agile PLM accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Agile PLM accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61166 | 1 Oracle | 2 Agile Plm, Agile Product Lifecycle Management | 2026-08-25 | 8.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: User and User Group). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile PLM. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Agile PLM. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61169 | 1 Oracle | 2 Agile Plm, Agile Product Lifecycle Management | 2026-08-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Agile PLM executes to compromise Oracle Agile PLM. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Agile PLM, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile PLM accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61171 | 1 Oracle | 2 Agile Plm, Agile Product Lifecycle Management | 2026-08-25 | 9.1 Critical |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile PLM. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Agile PLM accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile PLM accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61172 | 1 Oracle | 2 Agile Plm, Agile Product Lifecycle Management | 2026-08-25 | 7.5 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile PLM. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile PLM accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61173 | 1 Oracle | 2 Agile Plm, Agile Product Lifecycle Management | 2026-08-25 | 7.4 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 9.3.6. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile PLM. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Agile PLM accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Agile PLM accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2021-26272 | 2 Ckeditor, Oracle | 10 Ckeditor, Agile Product Lifecycle Management, Application Express and 7 more | 2026-08-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| It was possible to execute a ReDoS-type attack inside CKEditor 4 before 4.16 by persuading a victim to paste crafted URL-like text into the editor, and then press Enter or Space (in the Autolink plugin). | ||||
| CVE-2019-17569 | 6 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 3 more | 17 Tomcat, Tomee, Debian Linux and 14 more | 2026-08-25 | 4.8 Medium |
| The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. | ||||