Export limit exceeded: 344866 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (344866 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-10130 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Layers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'webcam' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 0.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10186 | 2 Whydonate, Wordpress | 2 Wp Whydonate, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WhyDonate – FREE Donate button – Crowdfunding – Fundraising plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the remove_row function in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.15. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete rows from the wp_wdplugin_style table. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1043 | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The Embed Any Document – Embed PDF, Word, PowerPoint and Excel Files plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.5 via the 'embeddoc' shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10682 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The TARIFFUXX plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection in versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to insufficient neutralization of user-supplied input used directly in SQL queries. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject additional SQL into queries and extract sensitive information from the database via a crafted id attribute in the 'tariffuxx_configurator' shortcode. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12394 | 2 Jonathankissam, Wordpress | 2 Action Network, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Action Network plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 'page' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23555 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in chenyenming Ui Slider Filter By Price ui-slider-filter-by-price allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Ui Slider Filter By Price: from n/a through <= 1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30506 | 1 Intel | 1 Driver\&support Assistant | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| Uncontrolled search path for some Intel Driver and Support Assistant before version 25.2 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64766 | 2 Nixos, Onlyoffice | 2 Nixos, Onlyoffice | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| NixOS's Onlyoffice is a software suite that offers online and offline tools for document editing, collaboration, and management. In versions from 22.11 to before 25.05 and versions before Unstable 25.11, a hard-coded secret was used in the NixOS module for the OnlyOffice document server to protect its file cache. An attacker with knowledge of an existing revision ID could use this secret to obtain a document. In practice, an arbitrary revision ID should be hard to obtain. The primary impact is likely the access to known documents from users with expired access. This issue was resolved in NixOS unstable version 25.11 and version 25.05. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6518 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in PySpur-Dev pyspur up to 0.1.18. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function SingleLLMCallNode of the file backend/pyspur/nodes/llm/single_llm_call.py of the component Jinja2 Template Handler. The manipulation of the argument user_message leads to improper neutralization of special elements used in a template engine. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23557 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kathleen Malone Find Your Reps find-your-reps allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Find Your Reps: from n/a through <= 1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23558 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in digitalfisherman Geotagged Media geotagged-media allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Geotagged Media: from n/a through <= 0.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3051 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Linux::Statm::Tiny for Perl before 0.0701 allows untrusted code from the current working directory ('.') to be loaded similar to CVE-2016-1238. If an attacker can place a malicious file in current working directory, it may be loaded instead of the intended file, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. Linux::Statm::Tiny uses Mite to produce the affected code section due to CVE-2025-30672 | ||||
| CVE-2025-33023 | 1 Siemens | 11 Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000re, Ruggedcom Rox Rx1400 and 8 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions). The affected devices do not properly enforce the restriction of files that can be uploaded from the web interface. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges in the web interface to upload arbitrary files. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40002 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: thunderbolt: Fix use-after-free in tb_dp_dprx_work The original code relies on cancel_delayed_work() in tb_dp_dprx_stop(), which does not ensure that the delayed work item tunnel->dprx_work has fully completed if it was already running. This leads to use-after-free scenarios where tb_tunnel is deallocated by tb_tunnel_put(), while tunnel->dprx_work remains active and attempts to dereference tb_tunnel in tb_dp_dprx_work(). A typical race condition is illustrated below: CPU 0 | CPU 1 tb_dp_tunnel_active() | tb_deactivate_and_free_tunnel()| tb_dp_dprx_start() tb_tunnel_deactivate() | queue_delayed_work() tb_dp_activate() | tb_dp_dprx_stop() | tb_dp_dprx_work() //delayed worker cancel_delayed_work() | tb_tunnel_put(tunnel); | | tunnel = container_of(...); //UAF | tunnel-> //UAF Replacing cancel_delayed_work() with cancel_delayed_work_sync() is not feasible as it would introduce a deadlock: both tb_dp_dprx_work() and the cleanup path acquire tb->lock, and cancel_delayed_work_sync() would wait indefinitely for the work item that cannot proceed. Instead, implement proper reference counting: - If cancel_delayed_work() returns true (work is pending), we release the reference in the stop function. - If it returns false (work is executing or already completed), the reference is released in delayed work function itself. This ensures the tb_tunnel remains valid during work item execution while preventing memory leaks. This bug was found by static analysis. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23579 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in digitalzoomstudio DZS Ajaxer Lite dzs-ajaxer-lite-dynamic-page-load allows Stored XSS.This issue affects DZS Ajaxer Lite: from n/a through <= 1.04. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30520 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in crosstec Breezing Forms breezing-forms allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Breezing Forms: from n/a through <= 1.2.8.11. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40003 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mscc: ocelot: Fix use-after-free caused by cyclic delayed work The origin code calls cancel_delayed_work() in ocelot_stats_deinit() to cancel the cyclic delayed work item ocelot->stats_work. However, cancel_delayed_work() may fail to cancel the work item if it is already executing. While destroy_workqueue() does wait for all pending work items in the work queue to complete before destroying the work queue, it cannot prevent the delayed work item from being rescheduled within the ocelot_check_stats_work() function. This limitation exists because the delayed work item is only enqueued into the work queue after its timer expires. Before the timer expiration, destroy_workqueue() has no visibility of this pending work item. Once the work queue appears empty, destroy_workqueue() proceeds with destruction. When the timer eventually expires, the delayed work item gets queued again, leading to the following warning: workqueue: cannot queue ocelot_check_stats_work on wq ocelot-switch-stats WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at kernel/workqueue.c:2255 __queue_work+0x875/0xaf0 ... RIP: 0010:__queue_work+0x875/0xaf0 ... RSP: 0018:ffff88806d108b10 EFLAGS: 00010086 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000101 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: 0000000000000027 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff88806d123e88 RBP: ffffffff813c3170 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffed100da247d2 R10: ffffed100da247d1 R11: ffff88806d123e8b R12: ffff88800c00f000 R13: ffff88800d7285c0 R14: ffff88806d0a5580 R15: ffff88800d7285a0 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880e5725000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe18e45ea10 CR3: 0000000005e6c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? kasan_report+0xc6/0xf0 ? __pfx_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x10/0x10 call_timer_fn+0x25/0x1c0 __run_timer_base.part.0+0x3be/0x8c0 ? __pfx_delayed_work_timer_fn+0x10/0x10 ? rcu_sched_clock_irq+0xb06/0x27d0 ? __pfx___run_timer_base.part.0+0x10/0x10 ? try_to_wake_up+0xb15/0x1960 ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x80/0xe0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irq+0x10/0x10 tmigr_handle_remote_up+0x603/0x7e0 ? __pfx_tmigr_handle_remote_up+0x10/0x10 ? sched_balance_trigger+0x1c0/0x9f0 ? sched_tick+0x221/0x5a0 ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x80/0xe0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irq+0x10/0x10 ? tick_nohz_handler+0x339/0x440 ? __pfx_tmigr_handle_remote_up+0x10/0x10 __walk_groups.isra.0+0x42/0x150 tmigr_handle_remote+0x1f4/0x2e0 ? __pfx_tmigr_handle_remote+0x10/0x10 ? ktime_get+0x60/0x140 ? lapic_next_event+0x11/0x20 ? clockevents_program_event+0x1d4/0x2a0 ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x322/0x780 handle_softirqs+0x16a/0x550 irq_exit_rcu+0xaf/0xe0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x70/0x80 </IRQ> ... The following diagram reveals the cause of the above warning: CPU 0 (remove) | CPU 1 (delayed work callback) mscc_ocelot_remove() | ocelot_deinit() | ocelot_check_stats_work() ocelot_stats_deinit() | cancel_delayed_work()| ... | queue_delayed_work() destroy_workqueue() | (wait a time) | __queue_work() //UAF The above scenario actually constitutes a UAF vulnerability. The ocelot_stats_deinit() is only invoked when initialization failure or resource destruction, so we must ensure that any delayed work items cannot be rescheduled. Replace cancel_delayed_work() with disable_delayed_work_sync() to guarantee proper cancellation of the delayed work item and ensure completion of any currently executing work before the workqueue is deallocated. A deadlock concern was considered: ocelot_stats_deinit() is called in a process context and is not holding any locks that the delayed work item might also need. Therefore, the use of the _sync() variant is safe here. This bug was identified through static analysis. To reproduce the issue and validate the fix, I simulated ocelot-swit ---truncated--- | ||||
| CVE-2025-23588 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in baonguyenyam WOW Best CSS Compiler best-css-compiler allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects WOW Best CSS Compiler: from n/a through <= 2.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30521 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in giangmd93 GP Back To Top gp-back-to-top allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects GP Back To Top: from n/a through <= 3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33025 | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5). The 'traceroute' tool in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | ||||