Export limit exceeded: 346601 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (346601 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0875 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-04-17 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23491 | 1 Invoiceplane | 1 Invoiceplane | 2026-04-17 | 7.5 High |
| InvoicePlane is a self-hosted open source application for managing invoices, clients, and payments. A path traversal vulnerability exists in the `get_file` method of the `Guest` module's `Get` controller in InvoicePlane up to and including through 1.6.3. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files on the server by manipulating the input filename. This leads to the disclosure of sensitive information, including configuration files with database credentials. Version 1.6.4 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2666 | 1 Mingsoft | 1 Mcms | 2026-04-17 | 4.7 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in mingSoft MCMS 6.1.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /ms/file/uploadTemplate.do of the component Template Archive Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument File can lead to unrestricted upload. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1200 | 2026-04-17 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| A flaw was found in the rgaufman/live555 fork of live555. A remote attacker could exploit a segmentation fault, in the `increaseBufferTo` function. This vulnerability can lead to memory corruption problems and potentially other consequences. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2667 | 1 Rongzhitong | 1 Visual Integrated Command And Dispatch Platform | 2026-04-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Rongzhitong Visual Integrated Command and Dispatch Platform up to 20260206. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /dispatch/api?cmd=userinfo. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40255 | 1 Adonisjs | 2 Http-core, Http-server | 2026-04-17 | 6.1 Medium |
| AdonisJS HTTP Server is a package for handling HTTP requests in the AdonisJS framework. In @adonisjs/http-server versions prior to 7.8.1 and 8.0.0-next.0 through 8.1.3, and @adonisjs/core versions prior to 7.4.0, the response.redirect().back() method reads the Referer header from the incoming HTTP request and redirects to that URL without validating the host.An attacker who can influence the Referer header can cause the application to redirect users to a malicious external site. This affects all AdonisJS applications that use response.redirect().back() or response.redirect('back'). This issue has been fixed in versions 7.8.1 and 8.2.0 and 7.4.0 of @adonisjs/core. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66236 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-04-17 | 7.5 High |
| Before Airflow 3.2.0, it was unclear that secure Airflow deployments require the Deployment Manager to take appropriate actions and pay attention to security details and security model of Airflow. Some assumptions the Deployment Manager could make were not clear or explicit enough, even though Airflow's intentions and security model of Airflow did not suggest different assumptions. The overall security model [1], workload isolation [2], and JWT authentication details [3] are now described in more detail. Users concerned with role isolation and following the Airflow security model of Airflow are advised to upgrade to Airflow 3.2, where several security improvements have been implemented. They should also read and follow the relevant documents to make sure that their deployment is secure enough. It also clarifies that the Deployment Manager is ultimately responsible for securing your Airflow deployment. This had also been communicated via Airflow 3.2.0 Blog announcement [4]. [1] Security Model: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/security/jwt_token_authentication.html [2] Workload isolation: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/security/workload.html [3] JWT Token authentication: https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/security/jwt_token_authentication.html [4] Airflow 3.2.0 Blog announcement: https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-3.2.0/ Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.0, which fixes this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33858 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-04-17 | 8.8 High |
| Dag Authors, who normally should not be able to execute code in the webserver context could craft XCom payload causing the webserver to execute arbitrary code. Since Dag Authors are already highly trusted, severity of this issue is Low. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Airflow 3.2.0, which resolves this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40265 | 1 Enchant97 | 1 Note-mark | 2026-04-17 | 5.9 Medium |
| Note Mark is an open-source note-taking application. In versions 0.19.1 and prior, the asset download endpoint at /api/notes/{noteID}/assets/{assetID} is registered without authentication middleware, and the backend query does not verify ownership or book visibility. An unauthenticated user who knows a valid note ID and asset ID can retrieve the full contents of private note assets without authentication, regardless of whether the associated book is public or private. This issue has been fixed in version 0.19.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31908 | 1 Apache | 1 Apisix | 2026-04-17 | 9.1 Critical |
| Header injection vulnerability in Apache APISIX. The attacker can take advantage of certain configuration in forward-auth plugin to inject malicious headers. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.12.0 through 3.15.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.16.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31923 | 1 Apache | 1 Apisix | 2026-04-17 | 7.5 High |
| Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability in Apache APISIX. This can occur due to `ssl_verify` in openid-connect plugin configuration being set to false by default. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 0.7 through 3.15.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.16.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31924 | 1 Apache | 1 Apisix | 2026-04-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability in Apache APISIX. tencent-cloud-cls log export uses plaintext HTTP This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.99.0 through 3.15.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.16.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25219 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-04-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The `access_key` and `connection_string` connection properties were not marked as sensitive names in secrets masker. This means that user with read permission could see the values in Connection UI, as well as when Connection was accidentaly logged to logs, those values could be seen in the logs. Azure Service Bus used those properties to store sensitive values. Possibly other providers could be also affected if they used the same fields to store sensitive data. If you used Azure Service Bus connection with those values set or if you have other connections with those values storing sensitve values, you should upgrade Airflow to 3.1.8 | ||||
| CVE-2026-40114 | 2 Mervinpraison, Praison | 2 Praisonai, Praisonai | 2026-04-17 | 7.2 High |
| PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.128, the /api/v1/runs endpoint accepts an arbitrary webhook_url in the request body with no URL validation. When a submitted job completes (success or failure), the server makes an HTTP POST request to this URL using httpx.AsyncClient. An unauthenticated attacker can use this to make the server send POST requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations, enabling SSRF against cloud metadata services, internal APIs, and other network-adjacent services. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.128. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40115 | 2 Mervinpraison, Praison | 2 Praisonai, Praisonai | 2026-04-17 | 6.2 Medium |
| PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.128, the WSGI-based recipe registry server (server.py) reads the entire HTTP request body into memory based on the client-supplied Content-Length header with no upper bound. Combined with authentication being disabled by default (no token configured), any local process can send arbitrarily large POST requests to exhaust server memory and cause a denial of service. The Starlette-based server (serve.py) has RequestSizeLimitMiddleware with a 10MB limit, but the WSGI server lacks any equivalent protection. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.128. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40116 | 2 Mervinpraison, Praison | 2 Praisonai, Praisonai | 2026-04-17 | 7.5 High |
| PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.128, the /media-stream WebSocket endpoint in PraisonAI's call module accepts connections from any client without authentication or Twilio signature validation. Each connection opens an authenticated session to OpenAI's Realtime API using the server's API key. There are no limits on concurrent connections, message rate, or message size, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to exhaust server resources and drain the victim's OpenAI API credits. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.128. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33815 | 2 Jackc, Pgx Project | 2 Pgx, Pgx | 2026-04-17 | 9.8 Critical |
| Memory-safety vulnerability in github.com/jackc/pgx/v5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2668 | 1 Rongzhitong | 1 Visual Integrated Command And Dispatch Platform | 2026-04-17 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in Rongzhitong Visual Integrated Command and Dispatch Platform up to 20260206. This affects an unknown function of the file /dm/dispatch/user/add of the component User Handler. The manipulation results in improper access controls. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0573 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-04-17 | 9.0 Critical |
| An URL redirection vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed attacker-controlled redirects to leak sensitive authorization tokens. The repository_pages API insecurely followed HTTP redirects when fetching artifact URLs, preserving the authorization header containing a privileged JWT. An authenticated user could redirect these requests to an attacker-controlled domain, exfiltrate the Actions.ManageOrgs JWT, and leverage it for potential remote code execution. Attackers would require access to the target GitHub Enterprise Server instance and the ability to exploit a legacy redirect to an attacker-controlled domain. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.19 and was fixed in versions 3.19.2, 3.18.4, 3.17.10, 3.16.13, 3.15.17, and 3.14.22. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1355 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-04-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| A Missing Authorization vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an attacker to upload unauthorized content to another user’s repository migration export due to a missing authorization check in the repository migration upload endpoint. By supplying the migration identifier, an attacker could overwrite or replace a victim’s migration archive, potentially causing victims to download attacker-controlled repository data during migration restores or automated imports. An attacker would require authentication to the victim's GitHub Enterprise Server instance. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.20 and was fixed in versions 3.19.2, 3.18.5, 3.17.11, 3.16.14, 3.15.18, 3.14.23. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | ||||